Literature DB >> 20962073

A within-trial measure of the stop signal reaction time in a head-unrestrained oculomotor countermanding task.

Samanthi C Goonetilleke1, Timothy J Doherty, Brian D Corneil.   

Abstract

The countermanding (or stop-signal) task, which requires the cancellation of an impending response on the infrequent presentation of a stop signal, enables study of the contextual control of movement generation and suppression. Here we present a novel and empirical measure of the time needed to cancel an impending gaze shift by recording neck muscle activity during a head-unrestrained oculomotor countermanding paradigm. On a subset of stop signal trials, subjects generated small head movements toward a target even though gaze remained stable due to a compensatory vestibular-ocular reflex. On such trials, we observed a burst of antagonist neck muscle activity during the small head-only error. Such antagonist neck muscle activity served as an active braking pulse as its magnitude scaled with the kinematics of the head-only error. This activity was selective for trials in which the head was arrested in mid-flight and did not appear on trials without a stop signal, on noncancelled stop signal trials when the gaze shift was completed, or on stop signal trials without head motion. Importantly, the timing of this antagonist activity related best to the onset of the stop signal (lagging it by ∼180 ms), and strongly correlated with behavioral estimates of the time needed to cancel a movement (the stop signal reaction time). These results are consistent with the notion that such selective antagonist neck muscle activity arises as a peripheral expression of the oculomotor stop process that successfully cancelled the gaze shift. Studying movement cancellation within nested systems like the head-unrestrained gaze shifting system offers a unique opportunity for investigating underlying neural mechanisms as the overall goal (i.e., to cancel a gaze shift) can be achieved despite motion of other components; on such individual trials, the oculomotor stop process is expressed as an active braking pulse.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20962073     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00495.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cross-species comparison of anticipatory and stimulus-driven neck muscle activity well before saccadic gaze shifts in humans and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Samanthi C Goonetilleke; Leor Katz; Daniel K Wood; Chao Gu; Alexander C Huk; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  On Stopping Voluntary Muscle Relaxations and Contractions: Evidence for Shared Control Mechanisms and Muscle State-Specific Active Breaking.

Authors:  Jack De Havas; Sho Ito; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Partial response electromyography as a marker of action stopping.

Authors:  Liisa Raud; Christina Thunberg; René J Huster
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Current advances and pressing problems in studies of stopping.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; David C Godlove
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Temporal cascade of frontal, motor and muscle processes underlying human action-stopping.

Authors:  Sumitash Jana; Ricci Hannah; Vignesh Muralidharan; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Active Braking of Whole-Arm Reaching Movements Provides Single-Trial Neuromuscular Measures of Movement Cancellation.

Authors:  Jeroen Atsma; Femke Maij; Chao Gu; W Pieter Medendorp; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stopping eyes and hands: evidence for non-independence of stop and go processes and for a separation of central and peripheral inhibition.

Authors:  Alessandro Gulberti; Petra A Arndt; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Animal Models of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: The Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Brian D Corneil; Aaron J Camp
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.