CONTEXT: The extent to which 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and IGF-I influence bone mineral content (BMC) accrual from early to mid-puberty is unclear. OBJECTIVE, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study sought to determine relationships among 25(OH)D, IGF-I, and BMC in community-dwelling prepubertal females (n = 76; aged 4-8 yr at baseline) over a period of up to 9 yr. DESIGN: The hypothesis that changes in IGF-I vs. 25(OH)D are more strongly associated with BMC accrual was formulated after data collection. 25(OH)D and IGF-I were log-transformed and further adjusted using two-way ANOVA for differences in season and race. Linear mixed modeling (including a random subject-specific intercept and a random subject-specific slope on age) was employed to analyze the proportion of variance the transformed 25(OH)D and IGF-I variables explained for the bone outcomes. RESULTS: IGF-I was more strongly associated with BMC accrual than 25(OH)D at the total body (R(2) = 0.874 vs. 0.809), proximal femur (R(2) = 0.847 vs. 0.771), radius (R(2) = 0.812 vs. 0.759), and lumbar spine (R(2) = 0.759 vs. 0.698). The rate of BMC accrual was positively associated with changes in IGF-I but negatively associated with 25(OH)D. When IGF-I and 25(OH)D were included in the same regression equation, 25(OH)D did not have a significant predictive effect on BMC accrual above and beyond that of IGF-I. CONCLUSIONS: These prospective data in early adolescent females indicate that both 25(OH)D and IGF-I have a significant impact on bone mineral accrual; however, the positive association of IGF-I and BMC accrual is greater than the negative association of 25(OH)D and BMC accrual.
CONTEXT: The extent to which 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and IGF-I influence bone mineral content (BMC) accrual from early to mid-puberty is unclear. OBJECTIVE, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study sought to determine relationships among 25(OH)D, IGF-I, and BMC in community-dwelling prepubertal females (n = 76; aged 4-8 yr at baseline) over a period of up to 9 yr. DESIGN: The hypothesis that changes in IGF-I vs. 25(OH)D are more strongly associated with BMC accrual was formulated after data collection. 25(OH)D and IGF-I were log-transformed and further adjusted using two-way ANOVA for differences in season and race. Linear mixed modeling (including a random subject-specific intercept and a random subject-specific slope on age) was employed to analyze the proportion of variance the transformed 25(OH)D and IGF-I variables explained for the bone outcomes. RESULTS:IGF-I was more strongly associated with BMC accrual than 25(OH)D at the total body (R(2) = 0.874 vs. 0.809), proximal femur (R(2) = 0.847 vs. 0.771), radius (R(2) = 0.812 vs. 0.759), and lumbar spine (R(2) = 0.759 vs. 0.698). The rate of BMC accrual was positively associated with changes in IGF-I but negatively associated with 25(OH)D. When IGF-I and 25(OH)D were included in the same regression equation, 25(OH)D did not have a significant predictive effect on BMC accrual above and beyond that of IGF-I. CONCLUSIONS: These prospective data in early adolescent females indicate that both 25(OH)D and IGF-I have a significant impact on bone mineral accrual; however, the positive association of IGF-I and BMC accrual is greater than the negative association of 25(OH)D and BMC accrual.
Authors: M J E Walenkamp; M Karperien; A M Pereira; Y Hilhorst-Hofstee; J van Doorn; J W Chen; S Mohan; A Denley; B Forbes; H A van Duyvenvoorde; S W van Thiel; C A Sluimers; J J Bax; J A P M de Laat; M B Breuning; J A Romijn; J M Wit Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Emma M Laing; Alissa R Wilson; Christopher M Modlesky; Patrick J O'Connor; Daniel B Hall; Richard D Lewis Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Steven A Abrams; Ian J Griffin; Keli M Hawthorne; Sheila K Gunn; Caren M Gundberg; Thomas O Carpenter Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-08-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Giuseppe Saggese; Francesco Vierucci; Flavia Prodam; Fabio Cardinale; Irene Cetin; Elena Chiappini; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Maddalena Massari; Emanuele Miraglia Del Giudice; Michele Miraglia Del Giudice; Diego Peroni; Luigi Terracciano; Rino Agostiniani; Domenico Careddu; Daniele Giovanni Ghiglioni; Gianni Bona; Giuseppe Di Mauro; Giovanni Corsello Journal: Ital J Pediatr Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 2.638
Authors: Joseph M Kindler; Norman K Pollock; Hannah L Ross; Christopher M Modlesky; Harshvardhan Singh; Emma M Laing; Richard D Lewis Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Henrikki Nordman; Raimo Voutilainen; Tomi Laitinen; Leena Antikainen; Jarmo Jääskeläinen Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: C M Weaver; C M Gordon; K F Janz; H J Kalkwarf; J M Lappe; R Lewis; M O'Karma; T C Wallace; B S Zemel Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: S J Warden; K M Hill; A J Ferira; E M Laing; B R Martin; D B Hausman; C M Weaver; M Peacock; R D Lewis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Paige K Berger; Norman K Pollock; Emma M Laing; Valerie Chertin; Paul J Bernard; Arthur Grider; Sue A Shapses; Ke-Hong Ding; Carlos M Isales; Richard D Lewis Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: J M Kindler; N K Pollock; E M Laing; N T Jenkins; A Oshri; C Isales; M Hamrick; R D Lewis Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 5.958