Literature DB >> 20961944

The other crisis: the economics and financing of maternal, newborn and child health in Asia.

Ian Anderson1, Henrik Axelson, B-K Tan.   

Abstract

The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008/2009 was the largest economic slowdown since the Great Depression. It undermined the growth and development prospects of developing countries. Several recent studies estimate the impact of economic shocks on the poor and vulnerable, especially women and children. Infant and child mortality rates are still likely to continue to decline, but at lower rates than would have been the case in the absence of the GFC. Asia faces special challenges. Despite having been the fastest growing region in the world for decades, and even before the current crisis, this region accounted for nearly 34% of global deaths of children under 5, more than 40% of maternal deaths and 60% of newborn deaths. Global development goals cannot be achieved without much faster and deeper progress in Asia. Current health financing systems in much of Asia are not well placed to respond to the needs of women and their children, or the recent global financial and economic slowdown. Public expenditure is often already too low, and high levels of out-of-pocket health expenditure are an independent cause of inequity and impoverishment for women and their children. The GFC highlights the need for reforms that will improve health outcomes for the poor, protect the vulnerable from financial distress, improve public expenditure patterns and resource allocation decisions, and so strengthen health systems. This paper aims to highlight the most recent assessments of how economic shocks, including the GFC, affect the poor in developing countries, especially vulnerable women and children in Asia. It concludes that conditional cash transfers, increasing taxation on tobacco and increasing the level, and quality, of public expenditure through well-designed investment programmes are particularly relevant in the context of an economic shock. That is because these initiatives simultaneously improve health outcomes for the poor and vulnerable, protect them from further financial distress, improve public financing and/or provide a much-needed counter-cyclical stimulus at times of economic slowdown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20961944     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czq067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  4 in total

1.  Public expenditure and healthcare utilization: the case of reproductive health care in India.

Authors:  Dhiman Das
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2017-07-12

2.  Inequity in costs of seeking sexual and reproductive health services in India and Kenya.

Authors:  Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli; Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström; Yves Lafort; Mags Beksinska; Letitia Rambally; Anuradha Roy; Sushena Reza-Paul; Wilkister Ombidi; Peter Gichangi; Jolene Skordis-Worrall
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  A comparison of maternal and newborn health services costs in Sindh Pakistan.

Authors:  Asif Raza Khowaja; Craig Mitton; Rahat Qureshi; Stirling Bryan; Laura A Magee; Peter von Dadelszen; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Causes and determinants of inequity in maternal and child health in Vietnam.

Authors:  Mats Målqvist; Dinh Thi Phuong Hoa; Sarah Thomsen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.