Jun Yim1, Seung-Sik Hwang, Keun-Young Yoo, Chang-Yup Kim. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, 534-2 Yeonsu3-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 406-799, Korea. yim99@gachon.ac.kr
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in the survival rates of cancer patients according to socioeconomic status, focusing on the role of the degree of healthcare utilisation by the patient. METHODS: An observational follow-up study was done for 261 lung cancer, 259 liver cancer, 268 stomach cancer and 270 colon cancer patients, diagnosed during 1999-2002. Income status and healthcare utilisation were assessed with National Health Insurance (NHI) data; survival during 1999-2002 was identified by death certificate. HRs and 95% CI were derived from Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The HRs for low income status are larger for colon cancer (2.37, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.80), followed by stomach (1.67, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.78), liver (1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.39) and lung cancers (1.46, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.14). In the model including the variable of healthcare utilisation, colon and stomach cancers exhibited a lower HR in the moderate healthcare utilisation groups (0.40, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.76 in colon; 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.96 in stomach), whereas for liver cancer, the high utilisation group exhibited a higher hazard (1.72, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.75). A lower income status is independently related to a shorter survival time in cancer patients, especially in less fatal cancers. Healthcare utilisation independently affects the likelihood of survival from colon and stomach cancers, implying that a moderate degree of healthcare utilisation contributes to a longer survival time.
OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in the survival rates of cancerpatients according to socioeconomic status, focusing on the role of the degree of healthcare utilisation by the patient. METHODS: An observational follow-up study was done for 261 lung cancer, 259 liver cancer, 268 stomach cancer and 270 colon cancerpatients, diagnosed during 1999-2002. Income status and healthcare utilisation were assessed with National Health Insurance (NHI) data; survival during 1999-2002 was identified by death certificate. HRs and 95% CI were derived from Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The HRs for low income status are larger for colon cancer (2.37, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.80), followed by stomach (1.67, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.78), liver (1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.39) and lung cancers (1.46, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.14). In the model including the variable of healthcare utilisation, colon and stomach cancers exhibited a lower HR in the moderate healthcare utilisation groups (0.40, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.76 in colon; 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.96 in stomach), whereas for liver cancer, the high utilisation group exhibited a higher hazard (1.72, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.75). A lower income status is independently related to a shorter survival time in cancerpatients, especially in less fatal cancers. Healthcare utilisation independently affects the likelihood of survival from colon and stomach cancers, implying that a moderate degree of healthcare utilisation contributes to a longer survival time.
Authors: Nathaniel Jembere; Michael A Campitelli; Morris Sherman; Jordan J Feld; Wendy Lou; Stuart Peacock; Eric Yoshida; Murray D Krahn; Craig Earle; Hla-Hla Thein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jae Seong Jang; Dong Gue Shin; Hye Min Cho; Yujin Kwon; Dong Hui Cho; Kyung Bok Lee; Sang Soo Park; Jin Yoon; Yong Seog Jang; Il Myung Kim Journal: J Gastric Cancer Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 3.720
Authors: Mina Suh; Kui Son Choi; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Myung-Il Hahm; Yoon Young Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Eun-Cheol Park Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 1.817