Literature DB >> 20961529

Patterns of care and outcomes after computed tomography scans for headache.

John J You1, Jonathan Gladstone, Sean Symons, Dalia Rotstein, Andreas Laupacis, Chaim M Bell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: concerns exist about potential overuse of computed tomography (CT) scans for headache in ambulatory care.
METHODS: we sought to examine health services use, brain tumor diagnosis, and death during the year after CT scanning for headache by linking records of an audit of 3930 outpatient CT brain scans performed in 2005 in Ontario, Canada, to administrative databases.
RESULTS: of 623 patients receiving CT scans for a sole indication of headache, few (2.1%) scans contained findings potentially causing their headache. For most patients, the index CT scan was the only one received over an 11-year period. However, 28.4% of patients received 1 or more CT brain scans during the preceding decade and 6.7% received 1 or more CT brain scans during the subsequent year. Of the 473 patients (75.9%) whose index scan was ordered by a primary care physician, most (80.3%) did not see a specialist during follow-up. One patient with an indeterminate finding on the index scan was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor (0.2%), and 6 patients (1.0%) died during follow-up. Among the 4 deaths in which the cause could be determined, none were due to central nervous system causes.
CONCLUSION: because of the potential risk of cancer from exposure to ionizing radiation, efforts should be made to avoid CT scanning for headache when the likelihood of serious illness is low. Evidence-based decision rules that identify which patients with headache do not require neuroimaging may decrease the use of CT scans in situations of little benefit. 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20961529     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  5 in total

1.  Impact of patient requests on provider-perceived visit difficulty in primary care.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Peter Franks; Mitchell D Feldman; Anthony Jerant; Stephen G Henry; Debora A Paterniti; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A randomized trial of telemedicine efficacy and safety for nonacute headaches.

Authors:  Kai I Müller; Karl B Alstadhaug; Svein I Bekkelund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

4.  A comparative, population-based analysis of pituitary incidentalomas vs clinically manifesting sellar masses.

Authors:  Nadine M Vaninetti; David B Clarke; Deborah A Zwicker; Churn-Ern Yip; Barna Tugwell; Steve Doucette; Chris Theriault; Khaled Aldahmani; Syed Ali Imran
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.335

5.  Clinical predictors of significant intracranial computed tomography scan findings in adults experiencing headache disorder.

Authors:  Ulrich Igor Mbessoh Kengne; Callixte Kuate Tegueu; Dorothée Soh Mankong; Maggy Mbede; Ulrich Gael Tene; Boniface Moifo
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-03-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.