Literature DB >> 20961468

A comparative assessment of the response of three fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) to a spinosad-based bait: effect of ammonium acetate, female age, and protein hunger.

J C Piñero1, R F L Mau, R I Vargas.   

Abstract

Ammonia-releasing substances are known to play an important role in fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) attraction to food sources, and this information has been exploited for the development of effective synthetic food-based lures and insecticidal baits. In field studies conducted in Hawaii, we examined the behavioural response of wild female oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)), melon fly (B. cucurbitae (Coquillett)), and Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann)) to spinosad-based GF-120 NF Naturalyte Fruit Fly Bait(©) formulated to contain either 0, 1 or 2% ammonium acetate. Use of visually-attractive yellow bait stations for bait application in the field allowed for proper comparisons among bait formulations. Field cage tests were also conducted to investigate, using a comparative behavioural approach, the effects of female age and protein starvation on the subsequent response of F1 generation B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis to the same three bait formulations that were evaluated in the field. Our field results indicate a significant positive effect of the presence, regardless of amount, of AA in GF-120 for B. dorsalis and B. cucurbitae. For C. capitata, there was a significant positive linear relationship between the relative amounts of AA in bait and female response. GF-120 with no AA was significantly more attractive to female C. capitata, but not to female B. dorsalis or B. cucurbitae, than the control treatment. Our field cage results indicate that the effects of varying amounts of AA present in GF-120 can be modulated by the physiological stage of the female flies and that the response of female B. cucurbitae to GF-120 was consistently greater than that of B. dorsalis over the various ages and levels of protein starvation regimes evaluated. Results are discussed in light of their applications for effective fruit fly suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20961468     DOI: 10.1017/S0007485310000386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Entomol Res        ISSN: 0007-4853            Impact factor:   1.750


  4 in total

1.  Implementing a spinosad-based local bait station to control Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in high rainfall areas of Reunion Island.

Authors:  Camille Delpoux; Jean-Philippe Deguine
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.857

2.  Vision-mediated exploitation of a novel host plant by a tephritid fruit fly.

Authors:  Jaime C Piñero; Steven K Souder; Roger I Vargas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Addition of Ammonium Acetate to Protein-Borax Baited Traps Does Not Improve Attraction of Anastrepha obliqua or Anastrepha serpentina (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Authors:  Rodrigo Lasa; Trevor Williams
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  Field Tests of Three Alternative Insecticides with Protein Bait for the Development of an Insecticide Rotation Program to Control Melon Flies, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Authors:  Ikkei Shikano; Rosemary Gutierrez-Coarite; Christian Streit; Edwin Perez; Earl Fujitani; Ronald F L Mau
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.139

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.