Literature DB >> 20961232

Long-term safety of single and multiple infrared transcranial laser treatments in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Thomas J McCarthy1, Luis De Taboada, Paul K Hildebrandt, Ellen L Ziemer, Steven P Richieri, Jackson Streeter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Growing interest exists in the use of near-infrared laser therapies for the treatment of numerous neurologic conditions, including acute ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. In consideration of these trends, the objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety of transcranial laser therapy with continuous-wave (CW) near-infrared laser light (wavelength, 808 ± 10 nm, 2-mm diameter) with a nominal radiant power of 70 mW; power density, 2,230 mW/cm(2), and energy density, 268 J/cm(2) at the scalp (10 mW/cm(2) and 1.2 J/cm(2) at the cerebral cortical surface) in healthy Sprague-Dawley rats.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 120 anesthetized rats received sequential transcranial laser treatments to the right and left parietal areas of the head on the same day (minimum of 5 min between irradiation of each side), on either Day 1 or on each of Days 1, 3, and 5. Sixty anesthetized rats served as sham controls. Rats were evaluated 1 year after treatment for abnormalities in clinical hematology and brain and pituitary gland histopathology.
RESULTS: No toxicologically important differences were found in the clinical hematology results between sham-control and laser-treated rats for any hematologic parameters examined. All values fell within historic control reference ranges for aged Sprague-Dawley rats. Similarly, brain and pituitary gland histopathology showed no treatment-related abnormalities or induced neoplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: Single and multiple applications of transcranial laser therapy with 808-nm CW laser light at a nominal power density of 10 mW/cm(2) at the surface of the cerebral cortex appears to be safe in Sprague-Dawley rats 1 year after treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20961232     DOI: 10.1089/pho.2009.2581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg        ISSN: 1549-5418            Impact factor:   2.796


  12 in total

Review 1.  The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy.

Authors:  Hoon Chung; Tianhong Dai; Sulbha K Sharma; Ying-Ying Huang; James D Carroll; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Safety assessment of trans-tympanic photobiomodulation.

Authors:  Tae-Hyun Moon; Min Young Lee; Jae Yun Jung; Jin-Chul Ahn; So-Young Chang; Phil-Sang Chung; Chung-Ku Rhee; Yoon-Hwan Kim; Myung-Whan Suh
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Brain Photobiomodulation Therapy: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Farzad Salehpour; Javad Mahmoudi; Farzin Kamari; Saeed Sadigh-Eteghad; Seyed Hossein Rasta; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Effect of low-level laser therapy on cochlear hair cell recovery after gentamicin-induced ototoxicity.

Authors:  Chung-Ku Rhee; Peijie He; Jae Yun Jung; Jin-Chul Ahn; Phil-Sang Chung; Myung-Whan Suh
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  No evidence for toxicity after long-term photobiomodulation in normal non-human primates.

Authors:  Cécile Moro; Napoleon Torres; Katerina Arvanitakis; Karen Cullen; Claude Chabrol; Diane Agay; Fannie Darlot; Alim-Louis Benabid; John Mitrofanis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Nano-Pulsed Laser Therapy Is Neuroprotective in a Rat Model of Blast-Induced Neurotrauma.

Authors:  Rinat O Esenaliev; Irene Y Petrov; Yuriy Petrov; Jutatip Guptarak; Debbie R Boone; Emanuele Mocciaro; Harris Weisz; Margaret A Parsley; Stacy L Sell; Helen Hellmich; Jonathan M Ford; Connor Pogue; Douglas DeWitt; Donald S Prough; Maria-Adelaide Micci
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 7.  Near-infrared photonic energy penetration: can infrared phototherapy effectively reach the human brain?

Authors:  Theodore A Henderson; Larry D Morries
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.570

8.  Differential effects of 670 and 830 nm red near infrared irradiation therapy: a comparative study of optic nerve injury, retinal degeneration, traumatic brain and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Marcus K Giacci; Lachlan Wheeler; Sarah Lovett; Emma Dishington; Bernadette Majda; Carole A Bartlett; Emma Thornton; Elizabeth Harford-Wright; Anna Leonard; Robert Vink; Alan R Harvey; Jan Provis; Sarah A Dunlop; Nathan S Hart; Stuart Hodgetts; Riccardo Natoli; Corinna Van Den Heuvel; Melinda Fitzgerald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Turning On Lights to Stop Neurodegeneration: The Potential of Near Infrared Light Therapy in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Daniel M Johnstone; Cécile Moro; Jonathan Stone; Alim-Louis Benabid; John Mitrofanis
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Photobiomodulation for Alzheimer's Disease: Translating Basic Research to Clinical Application.

Authors:  Joachim Enengl; Michael R Hamblin; Peter Dungel
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.