Zhiqiang Guan1, Di Zhang1, Rongjie Huang2, Fang Zhang3, Qingrong Wang1, Shenglan Guo1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P. R. China. 2. Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P. R. China. 3. Department of Electrocardiography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between left atrial (LA) myocardial function and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in subjects with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: The study included a group of 118 hypertensive patients and normal subjects. LV diastolic dysfunction was classified into 4 groups: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Peak strain rates in systole (S-Sr), early diastole (E-Sr), and late diastole (A-Sr) were obtained from Doppler-derived strain rate imaging to evaluate LA myocardial deformation. RESULTS: No significant difference in LA dimension was observed in subjects with different degrees of LV diastolic dysfunction, although LA myocardial strain rate parameters were all significantly different across the 4 groups (all with P < 0.001). Compared with patients of normal diastolic function, the mild diastolic dysfunction group had significantly lower E-Sr (0.62 ± 0.18 s⁻¹ vs 1.20 ± 0.38 s⁻¹, P < 0.001) and S-Sr (0.78 ± 0.16 s⁻¹ vs 0.94 ± 0.22 s⁻¹, P < 0.001) but increased A-Sr (1.14 ± 0.29 s⁻¹ vs 1.00 ± 0.23 s⁻¹, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: By using strain rate imaging, significant changes of LA deformation in response to different stages of LV diastolic dysfunction were detected in subjects with preserved LVEF. Quantification of LA myocardial function rather than LA size may have the potential to predict early LV diastolic dysfunction in subjects with preserved LVEF.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between left atrial (LA) myocardial function and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in subjects with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: The study included a group of 118 hypertensivepatients and normal subjects. LV diastolic dysfunction was classified into 4 groups: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Peak strain rates in systole (S-Sr), early diastole (E-Sr), and late diastole (A-Sr) were obtained from Doppler-derived strain rate imaging to evaluate LA myocardial deformation. RESULTS: No significant difference in LA dimension was observed in subjects with different degrees of LV diastolic dysfunction, although LA myocardial strain rate parameters were all significantly different across the 4 groups (all with P < 0.001). Compared with patients of normal diastolic function, the mild diastolic dysfunction group had significantly lower E-Sr (0.62 ± 0.18 s⁻¹ vs 1.20 ± 0.38 s⁻¹, P < 0.001) and S-Sr (0.78 ± 0.16 s⁻¹ vs 0.94 ± 0.22 s⁻¹, P < 0.001) but increased A-Sr (1.14 ± 0.29 s⁻¹ vs 1.00 ± 0.23 s⁻¹, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: By using strain rate imaging, significant changes of LA deformation in response to different stages of LV diastolic dysfunction were detected in subjects with preserved LVEF. Quantification of LA myocardial function rather than LA size may have the potential to predict early LV diastolic dysfunction in subjects with preserved LVEF.
Authors: Angela B S Santos; Gabriela Querejeta Roca; Brian Claggett; Nancy K Sweitzer; Sanjiv J Shah; Inder S Anand; James C Fang; Michael R Zile; Bertram Pitt; Scott D Solomon; Amil M Shah Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Angela B S Santos; Elisabeth Kraigher-Krainer; Deepak K Gupta; Brian Claggett; Michael R Zile; Burkert Pieske; Adriaan A Voors; Marty Lefkowitz; Toni Bransford; Victor Shi; Milton Packer; John J V McMurray; Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Morgane Evin; Kathryn M Broadhouse; Fraser M Callaghan; Rachel T McGrath; Sarah Glastras; Rebecca Kozor; Samantha L Hocking; Jérôme Lamy; Alban Redheuil; Nadjia Kachenoura; Greg R Fulcher; Gemma A Figtree; Stuart M Grieve Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 9.951