Literature DB >> 20960392

Risk of lymph node metastasis associated with deeper invasion by early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: study based on endoscopic resection specimens.

L Alvarez Herrero1, R E Pouw, F G van Vilsteren, F J W ten Kate, M Visser, M I van Berge Henegouwen, B L A M Weusten, J J G H M Bergman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most risk estimations for lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia (AEC) with invasion into the muscularis mucosae (m3) or submucosa are based on surgical series. This study aimed to correlate the lymph node metastasis rate with m3 and submucosal infiltration depth of AEC in endoscopic resection specimens.
METHODS: Patients undergoing endoscopic resection for AEC between January 2000 and March 2008 at two centers were included if the endoscopic resection specimen showed m3 or submucosal cancer. Infiltration into the muscularis mucosae was defined as m3. Submucosal invasion was classified as sm1 (≤ 500 µm) or sm2/3 (> 500 µm). Exclusion criteria were chemotherapy or radiotherapy and nonradical endoscopic resection.
RESULTS: 82 patients included 57 with m3, 12 with sm1, and 13 with sm2/3 cancers. Of the tumors, 13 were poorly differentiated and five showed lymphovascular invasion. After initial endoscopic resection, seven patients underwent surgery and 75 endoscopic therapy. No lymph node metastases were found in 158 lymph nodes of the esophagectomy specimens and none of the endoscopically treated patients were diagnosed with lymph node metastasis during a median follow-up of 26 months (interquartile range [IQR] 14 - 41).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that lymph node metastasis risk for m3 and submucosal AEC may be lower than has been assumed on the basis of surgical series, and that current guidelines are valid regarding suitability of m3 AECs for endoscopic therapy. It may also suggest that selected patients with submucosal cancers are also eligible for endoscopic management. Confirmation of these results is needed in larger series with longer follow-up. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20960392     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  32 in total

1.  Measurement of the tumor invasion depth into the submucosa in early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (pT1b): Can microns be the new standard for the endoscopist?

Authors:  Hendrik Manner; Oliver Pech
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Management of patients with T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study on patient management and risk of metastatic disease.

Authors:  Dirk Schölvinck; Hannah Künzli; Sybren Meijer; Kees Seldenrijk; Mark van Berge Henegouwen; Jacques Bergman; Bas Weusten
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscopic resection for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuto Harada; Meina Zhao; Hideo Baba; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Dig Med Res       Date:  2019-04-22

4.  Pathological evaluation of gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection materials based on Japanese guidelines.

Authors:  Koji Nagata; Michio Shimizu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-11-16

Review 5.  Barrett's oesophagus: how should we manage it?

Authors:  O J Old; L M Almond; H Barr
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-19

6.  Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes between endoscopic and surgical resection for early-stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Kim; Hyunsoo Chung; Sung Kwan Shin; Hyoung-Il Kim; Jun Chul Park; Sang Kil Lee; Woo Jin Hyung; Yong Chan Lee; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  [Limitations of surgery for cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  E Karakas; C Oetzmann von Sochaczewski; T Haist; M Pauthner; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Risk of metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: a multicenter retrospective study in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Ryu Ishihara; Tsuneo Oyama; Seiichiro Abe; Hiroaki Takahashi; Hiroyuki Ono; Junko Fujisaki; Mitsuru Kaise; Kenichi Goda; Kenro Kawada; Tomoyuki Koike; Manabu Takeuchi; Rie Matsuda; Dai Hirasawa; Masayoshi Yamada; Junichi Kodaira; Masaki Tanaka; Masami Omae; Akira Matsui; Takashi Kanesaka; Akiko Takahashi; Shinichi Hirooka; Masahiro Saito; Yosuke Tsuji; Yuki Maeda; Hiroharu Yamashita; Ichiro Oda; Yasuhiko Tomita; Takashi Matsunaga; Shuji Terai; Soji Ozawa; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 9.  Endoscopic or Surgical Resection for Gastro-Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Albrecht Hoffmeister
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Can the Risk of Lymph Node Metastases Be Gauged in Endoscopically Resected Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinomas? A Multi-Center Study.

Authors:  Joshua A Boys; Stephanie G Worrell; Parakrama Chandrasoma; John G Vallone; Dipen M Maru; Lizhi Zhang; Shanda H Blackmon; Karen J Dickinson; Christy M Dunst; Wayne L Hofstetter; Michael J Lada; Brian E Louie; Daniela Molena; Thomas J Watson; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.