PURPOSE: Surgery for colorectal liver metastasis facilitates long-term survival, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves resectability but may also alter staging accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the efficacy of positron emission tomography (PET), PET-computed tomography (CT), CT and intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) in the detection of liver metastasis. METHODS: Between January 2007 and January 2010, 34 patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis were included in this retrospective analysis. Seventeen patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PET or PET-CT, CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and IUS were performed in all patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were analysed. Histopathological examination of the resected specimens served as standard reference. RESULTS: A total of 109 liver segments were resected, of which 50 showed no metastatic involvement (45.9%). For patients without systemic chemotherapy, sensitivities for PET, CT/MRI and IUS were 92%, 64% and 100% respectively as compared with 63%, 65% and 94% for patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a segment-based analysis. For PET, standardised uptake values were decreased by 3.9 in 10 patients after chemotherapy whereas lesion diameters were similar (3.0 vs. 3.2 cm). Additional metastases were detected by IUS in seven patients resulting in a change of operative procedure in 20.6%. CONCLUSION: Staging accuracy of colorectal liver metastasis is influenced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For PET, decreased tumour metabolism rather than downsizing may account for a drop in sensitivity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. IUS is critical to avoid incomplete resections.
PURPOSE: Surgery for colorectal liver metastasis facilitates long-term survival, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves resectability but may also alter staging accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the efficacy of positron emission tomography (PET), PET-computed tomography (CT), CT and intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) in the detection of liver metastasis. METHODS: Between January 2007 and January 2010, 34 patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis were included in this retrospective analysis. Seventeen patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PET or PET-CT, CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and IUS were performed in all patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were analysed. Histopathological examination of the resected specimens served as standard reference. RESULTS: A total of 109 liver segments were resected, of which 50 showed no metastatic involvement (45.9%). For patients without systemic chemotherapy, sensitivities for PET, CT/MRI and IUS were 92%, 64% and 100% respectively as compared with 63%, 65% and 94% for patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a segment-based analysis. For PET, standardised uptake values were decreased by 3.9 in 10 patients after chemotherapy whereas lesion diameters were similar (3.0 vs. 3.2 cm). Additional metastases were detected by IUS in seven patients resulting in a change of operative procedure in 20.6%. CONCLUSION: Staging accuracy of colorectal liver metastasis is influenced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For PET, decreased tumour metabolism rather than downsizing may account for a drop in sensitivity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. IUS is critical to avoid incomplete resections.
Authors: Bartosz Rydzewski; Farrokh Dehdashti; Brigid A Gordon; Sharlene A Teefey; Steven M Strasberg; Barry A Siegel Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: W Schmiegel; A Reinacher-Schick; D Arnold; U Graeven; V Heinemann; R Porschen; J Riemann; C Rödel; R Sauer; M Wieser; W Schmitt; H-J Schmoll; T Seufferlein; I Kopp; C Pox Journal: Z Gastroenterol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: James S Tomlinson; William R Jarnagin; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Peter Kornprat; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Kemeny; Murray F Brennan; Leslie H Blumgart; Michael D'Angelica Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kenneth Coenegrachts; Frank De Geeter; Leon ter Beek; Natascha Walgraeve; Shandra Bipat; Jaap Stoker; Hans Rigauts Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephan M Wildi; Christoph Gubler; Thomas Hany; Henrik Petrowsky; Pierre A Clavien; Wolfram Jochum; Tilman Gerlach; Michael Fried; Beat Mullhaupt Journal: J Clin Ultrasound Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 0.910
Authors: Karin Nielsen; Hester J Scheffer; José H Volders; Maurice J D L van der Vorst; Aukje A J M van Tilborg; Emile Fi Comans; E S M de Lange-de Klerk; Colin Sietses; Sybren Meijer; Martijn R Meijerink; M Petrousjka van den Tol Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Charlotte S van Kessel; Constantinus F M Buckens; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Helena M Verkooijen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Tim Akhurst; Mithat Gönen; Raymond E Baser; Lawrence H Schwartz; Scott Tuorto; Lynn A Brody; Anne Covey; Karen T Brown; Steven M Larson; Yuman Fong Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2022-08 Impact factor: 8.265