OBJECTIVE: Everolimus (RAD001) is a novel mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, and anti-proliferative activity in various malignancies has been reported. This study evaluated the anti-tumor effects and schedule-dependent synergism of everolimus in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in T-cell lymphoma cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human T-cell lymphoma cell lines Hut-78 and Jurkat were treated with increasing doses of everolimus, alone or in combination with doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, or bortezomib, using different dosing schedules. Anti-tumor effects were measured by assays for cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle distribution. Drug interactions were determined by median effect analysis. RESULTS: Exposure to everolimus alone induced G1 phase cell cycle arrest without significant apoptosis. With certain dosing schedules, everolimus showed synergism with doxorubicin, etoposide, and bortezomib, but antagonism with vincristine. Cytotoxic synergism was observed following cotreatment with doxorubicin and everolimus, bortezomib and everolimus, doxorubicin followed by everolimus, and bortezomib followed by everolimus. By contrast, cell exposure to everolimus followed by doxorubicin or followed by bortezomib resulted in antagonistic effects. Sequential exposure to doxorubicin or bortezomib followed by everolimus effectively prevented potential negative interactions, and resulted in drug synergism. Drug combination synergisms or antagonisms were associated with variable effects on the cell cycle distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus effectively inhibited the growth of T-cell lymphoma cells in vitro. Specific schedule-dependent combinations of everolimus with other anti-tumor agents which avoid potential drug antagonism and produce effective synergism may lead to clinically effective treatments for T-cell lymphoma.
OBJECTIVE:Everolimus (RAD001) is a novel mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, and anti-proliferative activity in various malignancies has been reported. This study evaluated the anti-tumor effects and schedule-dependent synergism of everolimus in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in T-cell lymphoma cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS:HumanT-cell lymphoma cell lines Hut-78 and Jurkat were treated with increasing doses of everolimus, alone or in combination with doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, or bortezomib, using different dosing schedules. Anti-tumor effects were measured by assays for cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle distribution. Drug interactions were determined by median effect analysis. RESULTS: Exposure to everolimus alone induced G1 phase cell cycle arrest without significant apoptosis. With certain dosing schedules, everolimus showed synergism with doxorubicin, etoposide, and bortezomib, but antagonism with vincristine. Cytotoxic synergism was observed following cotreatment with doxorubicin and everolimus, bortezomib and everolimus, doxorubicin followed by everolimus, and bortezomib followed by everolimus. By contrast, cell exposure to everolimus followed by doxorubicin or followed by bortezomib resulted in antagonistic effects. Sequential exposure to doxorubicin or bortezomib followed by everolimus effectively prevented potential negative interactions, and resulted in drug synergism. Drug combination synergisms or antagonisms were associated with variable effects on the cell cycle distribution. CONCLUSIONS:Everolimus effectively inhibited the growth of T-cell lymphoma cells in vitro. Specific schedule-dependent combinations of everolimus with other anti-tumor agents which avoid potential drug antagonism and produce effective synergism may lead to clinically effective treatments for T-cell lymphoma.
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Diane Prager; Robert Hermann; Lou Fehrenbacher; Bruce E Johnson; Alan Sandler; Mark G Kris; Hai T Tran; Pam Klein; Xin Li; David Ramies; David H Johnson; Vincent A Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Chiaki Tanaka; Terence O'Reilly; John M Kovarik; Nicholas Shand; Katharine Hazell; Ian Judson; Eric Raymond; Sabine Zumstein-Mecker; Christine Stephan; Anne Boulay; Marc Hattenberger; George Thomas; Heidi A Lane Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Giuseppe Giaccone; Roy S Herbst; Christian Manegold; Giorgio Scagliotti; Rafael Rosell; Vincent Miller; Ronald B Natale; Joan H Schiller; Joachim Von Pawel; Anna Pluzanska; Ulrich Gatzemeier; John Grous; Judith S Ochs; Steven D Averbuch; Michael K Wolf; Pamela Rennie; Abderrahim Fandi; David H Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roman Crazzolara; Adam Cisterne; Marilyn Thien; John Hewson; Rana Baraz; Kenneth F Bradstock; Linda J Bendall Journal: Blood Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Matthew J Schiewer; Robert Den; David T Hoang; Michael A Augello; Yaacov R Lawrence; Adam P Dicker; Karen E Knudsen Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 5.678