Literature DB >> 20959882

Low noise level unmasks late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiography.

Raul J Frances1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Identification of late potentials requires the reduction of random noise by signal averaging. The importance of using a very low noise level (NL) as the end point of the averaging process in patients with ventricular tachycardia, the variation of results when a lower than standard NL was used and the modification of the sensitivity of the test when a very low NL was reached were evaluated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Signal-averaged electrocardiograms were recorded in 36 patients with ischemic heart disease and spontaneous or induced sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Thirteen patients showed negative or indeterminate results on recordings with an NL of 0.3 μV. Eight patients (group 1) underwent a second recording with an NL of 0.1 μV. Eight normal volunteers constituted the control group (group 2). The total duration of the filtered QRS vector magnitude (QRSd), the root mean square voltage of the terminal 40 ms of the vector magnitude (RMS(40)) and the low amplitude signal duration under 40 μV in the terminal portion of the vector magnitude (LAS) modifications were evaluated. A significant difference (P<0.01) in these parameters was observed in group 1 (15.88%, 48.25% and 68.5%, respectively) when both recordings were compared. Tests were positive in all patients (100%) with NL reduction. In group 2, tests were negative in all patients (100%) at both NLs (0.3 μV and 0.1 μV). QRSd was 1.18% longer, RMS(40) was 1.38% lower and LAS was 3.55% longer with NL reduction.
CONCLUSION: Late potentials in patients with ischemic heart disease, ventricular tachycardia, and a negative or indeterminate signal-averaged electrocardiogram may be detected if the NL is reduced to 0.1 μV. Reduction of the NL increased the sensitivity of the test without modifying its specificity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Late potential; Noise level; SAECG; Sensitivity; Ventricular tachycardia

Year:  2010        PMID: 20959882      PMCID: PMC2954031     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 1205-6626


  21 in total

1.  Uncertainty principle of signal-averaged electrocardiography.

Authors:  J J Goldberger; S Challapalli; M Waligora; A H Kadish; D A Johnson; M W Ahmed; S Inbar
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: a statement by a task force committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  G Breithardt; M E Cain; N el-Sherif; N C Flowers; V Hombach; M Janse; M B Simson; G Steinbeck
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Prediction of arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram and ejection fraction.

Authors:  Andreas W Schoenenberger; Paul Erne; Stephan Ammann; Gerhard Gillmann; Richard Kobza; Andreas E Stuck
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  The signal-averaged ECG becomes late potential-positive at low noise levels in healthy subjects.

Authors:  E H Christiansen; L Frost; H Mlgaard; P E Thomsen; T T Nielsen; A K Pedersen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Importance of the endpoint of noise reduction in analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

Authors:  J S Steinberg; J T Bigger
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Time domain analysis of the signal averaged electrocardiogram to detect late potentials in heart failure patients with different etiologies.

Authors:  Ernani de Sousa Grell; Rogério Silva de Paula; Nancy Maria Martins de Oliveira Tobias; Paulo Jorge Moffa; César José Grupi; Alfredo José Mansur
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 7.  Variation in late potentials and the reproducibility of their measurement.

Authors:  T R Engel; D L Pierce; S P Murphy
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 8.  Signal-averaged electrocardiography.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Recording from the body surface of arrhythmogenic ventricular activity during the S-T segment.

Authors:  E J Berbari; B J Scherlag; R R Hope; R Lazzara
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography.

Authors:  D L Kuchar; C W Thorburn; N L Sammel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ventricular depolarisation vectors in exercise induced myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  Cameruddin W Vellani; Mohammad Yusuf; Sadia Mahmud; Satwat Hashmi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.