Literature DB >> 20959510

Dissociable neural systems support retrieval of how and why action knowledge.

Robert P Spunt1, Emily B Falk, Matthew D Lieberman.   

Abstract

In everyday discourse, people typically represent actions in one of two ways: how they are performed or why they are performed. In the present study, we determined the neural systems that support these natural modes of representing actions. Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while identifying how and why people perform various familiar actions. Identifying how actions are performed produced activity in premotor areas that support the execution of actions and in higher-order visual areas that support the perception of action-related objects; this finding supports an embodied view of action knowledge. However, identifying why actions are performed preferentially engaged areas of the brain associated with representing and reasoning about mental states; these areas were right temporoparietal junction, precuneus, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and posterior superior temporal sulcus. Our results suggest that why action knowledge is not sufficiently constituted by information in motor and visual systems, but requires a system for representing states of mind, which do not have reliable motor correlates or visual appearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20959510     DOI: 10.1177/0956797610386618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  35 in total

1.  Dissociating modality-specific and supramodal neural systems for action understanding.

Authors:  Robert P Spunt; Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Social cognition and the cerebellum: A meta-analytic connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Frank Van Overwalle; Tine D'aes; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Dissociation of a trait and a valence representation in the mPFC.

Authors:  Ning Ma; Kris Baetens; Marie Vandekerckhove; Laurens Van der Cruyssen; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  The dark side of self-focus: brain activity during self-focus in low and high brooders.

Authors:  Maxime Freton; Cédric Lemogne; Pauline Delaveau; Sophie Guionnet; Emily Wright; Emmanuel Wiernik; Eric Bertasi; Philippe Fossati
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition.

Authors:  Frank Van Overwalle; Mario Manto; Zaira Cattaneo; Silvia Clausi; Chiara Ferrari; John D E Gabrieli; Xavier Guell; Elien Heleven; Michela Lupo; Qianying Ma; Marco Michelutti; Giusy Olivito; Min Pu; Laura C Rice; Jeremy D Schmahmann; Libera Siciliano; Arseny A Sokolov; Catherine J Stoodley; Kim van Dun; Larry Vandervert; Maria Leggio
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Topology of the Structural Social Brain Network in Typical Adults.

Authors:  Longchuan Li; Jocelyne Bachevalier; Xiaoping Hu; Ami Klin; Todd M Preuss; Sarah Shultz; Warren Jones
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2018-11

7.  Validating the Why/How contrast for functional MRI studies of Theory of Mind.

Authors:  Robert P Spunt; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Folk explanations of behavior: a specialized use of a domain-general mechanism.

Authors:  Robert P Spunt; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-24

9.  From mind to matter: neural correlates of abstract and concrete mindsets.

Authors:  Michael Gilead; Nira Liberman; Anat Maril
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Authors:  Daniel P Kennedy; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.