Literature DB >> 20959440

Ki-67 index, tumor differentiation, and extent of liver involvement are independent prognostic factors in patients with liver metastases of digestive endocrine carcinomas.

O Hentic1, A Couvelard, V Rebours, M Zappa, S Dokmak, P Hammel, F Maire, D O'Toole, P Lévy, A Sauvanet, P Ruszniewski.   

Abstract

The prognosis remains ill-defined in patients with liver metastases of well-differentiated (WD) digestive endocrine carcinomas (DEC) with high Ki-67 index. The objectives of this study were to determine whether Ki-67 index, tumor differentiation, and extent of liver involvement are independent prognostic factors in patients with DEC, and whether chemotherapy commonly used in patients with poorly differentiated (PD) carcinomas might be applied to those with high Ki-67 index but well-differentiated DEC. Sixty-three patients with DEC metastatic to the liver were retrospectively studied and divided into three prognostic groups. Group 1 comprised patients with well-differentiated carcinomas and Ki-67 index<15% (n=28), group 2 comprised those with well-differentiated carcinomas and Ki-67 index≥15% (n=17), and group 3 comprised those with poorly differentiated carcinomas (n=18). Therapeutic strategy was decided in accordance to guidelines, and tumoral response rate was assessed by computed tomography scan (RECIST). Prognostic factors were determined by uni/multivariate analysis. The 5-year survival rates were 89, 36, and 6% in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that Ki-67 index≥15%, poor tumor differentiation, and large liver tumor burden were independent predictors of poorer survival. Disease control rates after etoposide-cisplatin were 50 and 53% in groups 2 and 3 respectively (NS). In conclusion, Ki-67 index, tumor differentiation, and extent of liver involvement are independent prognostic factors in patients with liver metastases of DEC. Patients with well-differentiated carcinomas with high Ki-67 index (≥15%) have intermediate prognosis and a similar response rate to the etoposide-cisplatin combination as those with poorly differentiated carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20959440     DOI: 10.1677/ERC-09-0319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer        ISSN: 1351-0088            Impact factor:   5.678


  18 in total

1.  Liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: Outcomes and prognostic variables.

Authors:  Linda S Sher; David M Levi; Julie S Wecsler; Mary Lo; Lydia M Petrovic; Susan Groshen; Lingyun Ji; Teresa Diago Uso; A Joseph Tector; Ann S Hamilton; J Wallis Marsh; Myron E Schwartz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Semi-quantitative visual assessment of hepatic tumor burden can reliably predict survival in neuroendocrine liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Yan Luo; Sanaz Ameli; Ankur Pandey; Pegah Khoshpouri; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Pallavi Pandey; Zhen Li; Daoyu Hu; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Role of surgery and transplantation in the treatment of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumor.

Authors:  Sayee Sundar Alagusundaramoorthy; Roberto Gedaly
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  AACE/ACE disease state clinical review: pancreatic neuroendocrine incidentalomas.

Authors:  Miguel F Herrera; Göran Åkerström; Peter Angelos; Clive S Grant; Ana O Hoff; Juan Pablo Pantoja; Rocio Pérez-Johnston; Dushyant V Sahani; Richard J Wong; Gregory Randolph
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Therapy of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): recent insights and advances.

Authors:  Tetsuhide Ito; Hisato Igarashi; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Role of Ki-67 proliferation index in the assessment of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasias regarding the stage of disease.

Authors:  H C Miller; P Drymousis; R Flora; R Goldin; D Spalding; A Frilling
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Multimodal liver-directed management of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Mark A Lewis; Joleen Hubbard
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-29

Review 8.  Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Gastroenteropancreatic System: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Emma Elizabeth Ilett; Seppo W Langer; Ingrid Holst Olsen; Birgitte Federspiel; Andreas Kjær; Ulrich Knigge
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-08

9.  Neuroendocrine neoplasms of liver - A 5-year retrospective clinico-pathological study applying World Health Organization 2010 classification.

Authors:  Deepak Kalyansingh Burad; Thomas Alex Kodiatte; Sayd Mohamed Rajeeb; Ashish Goel; Chundamannil Eapen Eapen; Banumathi Ramakrishna
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Comparative evaluation of three proliferation markers, Ki-67, TOP2A, and RacGAP1, in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms: Issues and prospects.

Authors:  Elisa Neubauer; Ralph M Wirtz; Daniel Kaemmerer; Maria Athelogou; Lydia Schmidt; Jörg Sänger; Amelie Lupp
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.