| Literature DB >> 20959312 |
Kajsa Landgren1, Nina Kvorning, Inger Hallström.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether acupuncture reduces the duration and intensity of crying in infants with colic. Patients and methods 90 otherwise healthy infants, 2-8 weeks old, with infantile colic were randomised in this controlled blind study. 81 completed a structured programme consisting of six visits during 3 weeks to an acupuncture clinic in Sweden. Parents blinded to the allocation of their children met a blinded nurse. The infant was subsequently given to another nurse in a separate room, who handled all infants similarly except that infants allocated to receive acupuncture were given minimal, standardised acupuncture for 2 s in LI4.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20959312 PMCID: PMC3002757 DOI: 10.1136/aim.2010.002394
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acupunct Med ISSN: 0964-5284 Impact factor: 2.267
Figure 1Flow chart of infants through the trial.
Baseline data for infants
| Infants starting the intervention (N=86) | Infants completing 3 weeks (N=81) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background characteristics | Acupuncture group (n= 46) | Control group (n=40) | Acupuncture group (n= 43) | Control group (n=38) |
| Firstborn, n (%) | 22 (48) | 22 (55) | 21 (49) | 21 (55) |
| Gender, female, n (%) | 22 (48) | 19 (48) | 21 (49) | 19 (50) |
| Gestational age, weeks, mean (SD) | 39.2 (1.5) | 39.5 (1.3) | 39.3 (1.4) | 39.5 (1.3) |
| Age when colic started, weeks, mean (SD) | 1.9 (1.3) | 1.5 (1.0) | 2 (1.3) | 1.5 (1) |
| Age at inclusion, weeks, mean (SD) | 5.0 (1.9) | 5.3 (1.7) | 5.1 (1.9) | 5.2 (1.6) |
| Solely breastfed, n (%) | 35 (76) | 26 (65) | 32 (74) | 25 (66) |
| Having a parent and/or sibling with food intolerance/allergy, n (%) | 17 (37) | 18 (45) | 15 (35) | 17 (45) |
| Having a parent and/or sibling who had had infantile colic, n (%) | 29 (63) | 23 (58) | 25 (58) | 20 (53) |
Baseline data for fussing, crying, colicky crying and the total duration of fussing, crying and colicky crying (TC)
| Infants starting the intervention (N=86) | Infants completing 3 weeks (N=81) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Categories of fussing and crying, min/day | Acupuncture group (n=46) | Control group (n= 40) | p Value | Acupuncture group (n=43) | Control group (n= 38) | p Value |
| Fussing, median (q1–q2) | 113 (57–178) | 146 (66–188) | 0.255 | 112 (57–161) | 148 (70–188) | 0.173 |
| Crying, median (q1–q2) | 86 (55–123) | 72 (36–119) | 0.170 | 85 (53–121) | 72 (34–119) | 0.228 |
| Colicky crying, median (q1–q2) | 37 (17–127) | 57 (21–96) | 0.515 | 37 (17–124) | 56 (20–92) | 0.418 |
| TC, median (q1–q2) | 260 (218–351) | 277 (231–370) | 0.286 | 251 (213–315) | 277 (230–368) | 0.187 |
Figure 2Proportion of infants with a mean total duration of fussing, crying and colicky crying (TC) under 180 min/day for each of the six treatments.
Fussing, crying, colicky crying and total duration of fussing, crying and colicky crying (TC) during the three intervention weeks for the infants still remaining in the trial at each of the intervention weeks
| First intervention week | Second intervention week | Third intervention week | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Categories of fussing and crying, min/day | Acupuncture group (n=46) | Control group (n=40) | p Value | Acupuncture group (n=44) | Control group (n=39) | p Value | Acupuncture group (n=43) | Control group (n=38) | p Value |
| Fussing, median (q1–q3) | 74 (53–154) | 129 (80–183) | 0.029 | 71 (41–123) | 102 (60–148) | 0.047 | 69 (36–109) | 85 (63–151) | 0.119 |
| Crying, median (q1–q3) | 76 (45–103) | 61 (30–102) | 0.428 | 52 (27–88) | 55 (24–73) | 0.964 | 54 (21–87) | 46 (22–98) | 0.846 |
| Colicky crying, median (q1–q3) | 20 (6–53) | 26 (9–48) | 0.634 | 9 (0–27) | 13 (4–49) | 0.046 | 3 (0–18) | 9 (0–18) | 0.087 |
| TC/day, median (q1–q3) | 193 (143–253) | 225 (178–316) | 0.025 | 164 (103–201) | 188 (149–273) | 0.016 | 149 (92–193) | 169 (119–267) | 0.062 |
Relative difference in fussing, crying, colicky crying and total duration of fussing, crying and colicky crying (TC) between the baseline week and the first, second and third intervention weeks, respectively
| Difference baseline – first intervention week | Difference baseline – second intervention week | Difference baseline – third intervention week | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Categories of crying and fussing, median min/day | Acupuncture group (n=46) | Control group (n=40) | p Value | Acupuncture group (n=44) | Control group (n=39) | p Value | Acupuncture group (n=43) | Control group (n=38) | p Value |
| Fussing, difference in % (min−max in %) | 22 (−956, 84) | 6 (−1614, 57) | 0.028 | 30 (−210, 98) | 26 (−2071, 89) | 0.158 | 43 (−317, 100) | 30 (−2242, 98) | 0.291 |
| Crying, difference in % (min−max in %) | 12 (−219, 100) | 13 (−786, 89) | 0.726 | 34 (−217, 100) | 30 (−486, 95) | 0.784 | 39 (−107, 100) | 44 (−543, 100) | 0.936 |
| Colicky crying, difference in % (min−max in %) | 57 (−443, 100) | 57 (−1050, 100) | 0.921 | 92 (−700, 100) | 73 (−191, 100) | 0.041 | 92 (8, 100) | 81 (−600, 100) | 0.062 |
| TC, difference in % (min−max in %) | 27 (−59, 69) | 16 (−59, 75) | 0.060 | 44 (−25, 92) | 29 (−67, 84) | 0.024 | 48 (−23, 86) | 42 (−71, 90) | 0.219 |
Infants who cried more than 10 s in the treatment room during the intervention
| Infants who cried more than 10 s during … | Acupuncture group (n=43) | Control group (n=38) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| … None of the treatments, n (%) | 11 (26) | 24 (63) | 35 (43) |
| … 1 Treatment, n (%) | 17 (40) | 10 (26) | 27 (33) |
| … 2 Treatments, n (%) | 8 (19) | 3 (8) | 11 (14) |
| … 3 Treatments, n (%) | 4 (9) | 1 (3) | 5 (6) |
| … 4 Treatments, n (%) | 3 (7) | 0 (0) | 3 (4) |
| … 5 or 6 Treatments, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |