Literature DB >> 20957673

A multiplex model of combining gene-based, protein-based, and metabolite-based with positive and negative markers in urine for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Da-Long Cao1, Ding-Wei Ye, Hai-Liang Zhang, Yao Zhu, Yi-Xuan Wang, Xu-Dong Yao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiplex urine-based assay emerged outperforms single biomarker (e.g., prostate-specific antigen, PSA) for predicting prostate cancer (CaP), whereas its combined mode has to be fully optimized. Our aim is to determine whether a strategy of combining gene-based, protein-based, metabolite-based with positive, negative makers in urine could optimize a multiplex model for detecting CaP.
METHODS: Using quantitative PCR, Western blot, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, expression patterns of PCA3, TMPRSS2: ERG, Annexin A3, Sarcosine, and urine PSA were evaluated in urine samples from 86 untreated patients with CaP and 45 patients with no evidence of malignancy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to generate a final model and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and special bootstrap software to assess diagnostic performance of tested variables.
RESULTS: The expression patterns of PCA3, TMPRSS2: ERG, Annexin A3, Sarcosine, and a panel including these biomarkers were significant predictors of CaP both in patients with PSA 4-10 ng/ml and in all patients (all P < 0.05). Employing ROC analysis, the area under the curves of the panel in these both cohorts were 0.840 and 0.856, respectively, which outperform that of any single biomarker (PCA3: 0.733 and 0.739; TMPRSS2: ERG: 0.720 and 0.732; Annexin A3: 0.716 and 0.728; Sarcosine: 0.659 and 0.665, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with single biomarker, the multiplex model including PCA3, TMPRSS2: ERG, Annexin A3 and Sarcosine adds even more to the diagnostic performance for predicting CaP. Further validation experiments and optimization for the strategy of constructing this model are warranted.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20957673     DOI: 10.1002/pros.21286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  33 in total

1.  Prostate cancer risk prediction in a urology clinic in Mexico.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liang; Jamie C Messer; Christopher Louden; Miguel A Jimenez-Rios; Ian M Thompson; Hector R Camarena-Reynoso
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 2.  Metabolomic profiling of hormone-dependent cancers: a bird's eye view.

Authors:  Stacy M Lloyd; James Arnold; Arun Sreekumar
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 12.015

3.  A potential panel of four-long noncoding RNA signature in prostate cancer predicts biochemical recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival.

Authors:  Tian-Bao Huang; Chuan-Peng Dong; Guang-Chen Zhou; Sheng-Ming Lu; Yang Luan; Xiao Gu; Lei Liu; Xue-Fei Ding
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Prostate cancer research in China.

Authors:  Shan-Cheng Ren; Rui Chen; Ying-Hao Sun
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  Multiscale integration of -omic, imaging, and clinical data in biomedical informatics.

Authors:  John H Phan; Chang F Quo; Chihwen Cheng; May Dongmei Wang
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

6.  The risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer using the prostate cancer prevention Trial Risk Calculator in a community setting.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liang; Donna P Ankerst; Ziding Feng; Rong Fu; Janet L Stanford; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Assays for prostate cancer : changing the screening paradigm?

Authors:  Jens Hansen; Michael Rink; Markus Graefen; Shahrokh Shariat; Felix K-H Chun
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Prospective evaluation of serum sarcosine and risk of prostate cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Stella Koutros; Tamra E Meyer; Stephen D Fox; Haleem J Issaq; Timothy D Veenstra; Wen-Yi Huang; Kai Yu; Demetrius Albanes; Lisa W Chu; Gerald Andriole; Robert N Hoover; Ann W Hsing; Sonja I Berndt
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  The role of sarcosine metabolism in prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Amjad P Khan; Thekkelnaycke M Rajendiran; Bushra Ateeq; Irfan A Asangani; Jyoti N Athanikar; Anastasia K Yocum; Rohit Mehra; Javed Siddiqui; Ganesh Palapattu; John T Wei; George Michailidis; Arun Sreekumar; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 10.  Biomarkers in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Carlo Buonerba; Daniela Terracciano; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Vincenzo Cosimato; Danilo Bottero; Victor M Deliu; Pasquale Ditonno; Sisto Perdonà; Riccardo Autorino; Ioman Coman; Sabino De Placido; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Ottavio De Cobelli
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.