BACKGROUND: There are ∼ 13,000 pediatric nurse practitioners (PNPs) in the United States. PNPs have been suggested as professionals who could provide care to the growing cadre of children with chronic illnesses and expand the pool of subspecialty care providers. Little is known about current roles of PNPs in primary or subspecialty care. OBJECTIVE: To gain a better understanding of the roles, focus of practice, professional setting, and professional responsibilities of PNPs. METHODS: We conducted a mail survey of a random national sample of 1200 PNPs stratified according to states that license NPs to practice independently. χ(2) statistics were used to assess responses from PNPs in states that allow independent practice versus those that do not and on PNPs in primary versus specialty care. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 82.4%. Ninety-six percent (n = 636) of the PNPs were female. More than half of all the respondents (59% [n = 391]) worked in primary care, and almost two-thirds (64% [n = 394]) did not provide care in inpatient settings. Only 11% of the PNPs in states that allow independent practice, practiced independently. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of PNPs currently work in primary care, and most do not have any inpatient roles. It does not seem that independent PNP practices are responsible for a significant portion of pediatric visits. For those who posit that PNPs will help alleviate the currently perceived shortage of pediatric subspecialists, our findings indicate that it likely will not occur without a significant change in the PNP workforce distribution.
BACKGROUND: There are ∼ 13,000 pediatric nurse practitioners (PNPs) in the United States. PNPs have been suggested as professionals who could provide care to the growing cadre of children with chronic illnesses and expand the pool of subspecialty care providers. Little is known about current roles of PNPs in primary or subspecialty care. OBJECTIVE: To gain a better understanding of the roles, focus of practice, professional setting, and professional responsibilities of PNPs. METHODS: We conducted a mail survey of a random national sample of 1200 PNPs stratified according to states that license NPs to practice independently. χ(2) statistics were used to assess responses from PNPs in states that allow independent practice versus those that do not and on PNPs in primary versus specialty care. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 82.4%. Ninety-six percent (n = 636) of the PNPs were female. More than half of all the respondents (59% [n = 391]) worked in primary care, and almost two-thirds (64% [n = 394]) did not provide care in inpatient settings. Only 11% of the PNPs in states that allow independent practice, practiced independently. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of PNPs currently work in primary care, and most do not have any inpatient roles. It does not seem that independent PNP practices are responsible for a significant portion of pediatric visits. For those who posit that PNPs will help alleviate the currently perceived shortage of pediatric subspecialists, our findings indicate that it likely will not occur without a significant change in the PNP workforce distribution.
Authors: Rebekah F Brown; Donna Beth Willey-Courand; Cindy George; Ann McMullen; Jordan Dunitz; Bonnie Slovis; Elizabeth Perkett Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2012-06-19
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Liana Fraenkel; Bing Lu; Erika Brown; Peter Tsao; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz; Asaf Bitton Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Kellie C Huxel Bliven; Kenneth C Lam; R Curtis Bay; Alison R Snyder Valier; John T Parsons Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 2.860