Literature DB >> 20955891

Food and feeding in Northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica Sars).

Katrin Schmidt1.   

Abstract

Early feeding studies on Meganyctiphanes norvegica described the morphology of the feeding appendages and the actual process of food uptake and digestion. Insights into diurnal, seasonal and ontogenetic pattern in feeding activity and diet were derived from field studies on the Clyde Sea population. Since then, technical advances have confirmed some of the early assumptions and rejected others. Submersible, remotely operated vehicles and echosounders, for instance, proved that M. norvegica stay often close to the seabed and feed on particles in the epibenthic layer and sediment-water interface. Scanning electron microscopy showed that mandibles of the so-called carnivorous M. norvegica have an elaborated grinding region, which allows efficient feeding on diatoms. Three-dimensional silhouette video imaging revealed mechanoreception, not vision, as the main sensory modality involved in proximity prey detection by M. norvegica. Fatty acid analysis and stomach content microscopy have now been conducted on M. norvegica across a range of environments including the Gulf of Maine, Greenland Sea, Barents Sea, Scandinavian fjords, the Kattegat and Mediterranean Sea. Regional and seasonal differences in the trophic environment are reflected in their daily ration and in the relative importance of copepods versus phytoplankton in their diet. Overall, phytoplankton is an important food source for M. norvegica during the spring bloom and part of the summer, but copepods are dominant in autumn and winter. Depending on their vertical co-occurrence, M. norvegica can feed on a range of copepods from early stages of Oithona spp. up to adult Calanus spp. There are clear ontogenetic differences in diet, with adults feeding more on copepods and benthic food items than early post-larvae. Future studies should link diet to simultaneously measured growth and reproduction and emphasise comparison across the spectrum of environments inhabited by this versatile species.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20955891     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381308-4.00005-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Mar Biol        ISSN: 0065-2881            Impact factor:   5.143


  6 in total

1.  Spatial and taxonomic variation of mercury concentration in low trophic level fauna from the Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  Kate L Buckman; Oksana Lane; Jože Kotnik; Arne Bratkic; Francesca Sprovieri; Milena Horvat; Nicola Pirrone; David C Evers; Celia Y Chen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  δ15N value does not reflect fasting in mysticetes.

Authors:  Alex Aguilar; Joan Giménez; Encarna Gómez-Campos; Luís Cardona; Asunción Borrell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Vertical distribution and diel vertical migration of krill beneath snow-covered ice and in ice-free waters.

Authors:  Hege Vestheim; Anders Røstad; Thor A Klevjer; Ingrid Solberg; Stein Kaartvedt
Journal:  J Plankton Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.455

4.  New suspension-feeding radiodont suggests evolution of microplanktivory in Cambrian macronekton.

Authors:  Rudy Lerosey-Aubril; Stephen Pates
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Distribution, maturity and population structure of Meganyctiphanes norvegica and Thysanoessa inermis around Iceland in spring.

Authors:  Teresa Silva; Astthor Gislason; Olafur S Astthorsson; Gudrún Marteinsdóttir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bioaccumulation of methylmercury within the marine food web of the outer Bay of Fundy, Gulf of Maine.

Authors:  Gareth Harding; John Dalziel; Peter Vass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.