AIMS: Previous studies indicate that addicts show reduced preference for more delayed versus more immediate rewards compared to non-addicts. This may reflect a lower propensity to view such decisions in terms of the larger sequences to which they typically belong (e.g. smoking is a frequently repeated act). Therefore, this study aims to test whether, in a sequence of decisions involving smaller, sooner (SS) versus larger, later (LL) rewards, suggesting or forcing people with a propensity to addiction to make the decision for the series as a whole would increase LL preference. It is hypothesized that people without a propensity to addiction should benefit less from being encouraged to think of reward sequences because they already tend to take that view. DESIGN: Thirty regular smokers (as exemplars of addicted individuals) and 30 non-smokers chose between small short-term and larger long-term monetary rewards over a sequence of four decisions spaced 2 weeks apart. Subjects were divided into three groups: one who made each decision independently with no suggestion that they be considered as a series ('free'), a group to whom it was suggested from the start that they consider each decision as part of the series ('suggested') and a group who were told that their very first choice in the series would be used for the remaining decisions ('forced'). All subjects were paid the amounts they had chosen. SETTING: A laboratory room at the University of Cape Town (UCT). PARTICIPANTS: UCT undergraduate volunteers. ANALYSES: The proportion of LL choices in each subgroup was evaluated by χ(2) tests and a probit model. FINDINGS: Smokers increased their preference for LL rewards when 'bundling' of individual decisions into a sequence was either suggested or forced. This preference increased with repeated experience. Non-smokers showed neither pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The propensity of smokers to prefer small short-term rewards over larger delayed rewards may be mitigated, over a sequence of decisions of this kind, by encouraging or forcing them to think of the sequence as a whole. If replicated, this finding may form the basis of an intervention that could attenuate the choice patterns characteristic of addiction.
AIMS: Previous studies indicate that addicts show reduced preference for more delayed versus more immediate rewards compared to non-addicts. This may reflect a lower propensity to view such decisions in terms of the larger sequences to which they typically belong (e.g. smoking is a frequently repeated act). Therefore, this study aims to test whether, in a sequence of decisions involving smaller, sooner (SS) versus larger, later (LL) rewards, suggesting or forcing people with a propensity to addiction to make the decision for the series as a whole would increase LL preference. It is hypothesized that people without a propensity to addiction should benefit less from being encouraged to think of reward sequences because they already tend to take that view. DESIGN: Thirty regular smokers (as exemplars of addicted individuals) and 30 non-smokers chose between small short-term and larger long-term monetary rewards over a sequence of four decisions spaced 2 weeks apart. Subjects were divided into three groups: one who made each decision independently with no suggestion that they be considered as a series ('free'), a group to whom it was suggested from the start that they consider each decision as part of the series ('suggested') and a group who were told that their very first choice in the series would be used for the remaining decisions ('forced'). All subjects were paid the amounts they had chosen. SETTING: A laboratory room at the University of Cape Town (UCT). PARTICIPANTS: UCT undergraduate volunteers. ANALYSES: The proportion of LL choices in each subgroup was evaluated by χ(2) tests and a probit model. FINDINGS: Smokers increased their preference for LL rewards when 'bundling' of individual decisions into a sequence was either suggested or forced. This preference increased with repeated experience. Non-smokers showed neither pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The propensity of smokers to prefer small short-term rewards over larger delayed rewards may be mitigated, over a sequence of decisions of this kind, by encouraging or forcing them to think of the sequence as a whole. If replicated, this finding may form the basis of an intervention that could attenuate the choice patterns characteristic of addiction.
Authors: James G Murphy; Ashley A Dennhardt; Jessica R Skidmore; Brian Borsari; Nancy P Barnett; Suzanne M Colby; Matthew P Martens Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2012-06-04
Authors: Mark K Greenwald; David M Ledgerwood; Leslie H Lundahl; Caren L Steinmiller Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Warren K Bickel; Matthew W Johnson; Mikhail N Koffarnus; James MacKillop; James G Murphy Journal: Annu Rev Clin Psychol Date: 2014 Impact factor: 18.561
Authors: James G Murphy; Ashley A Dennhardt; Matthew P Martens; Brian Borsari; Katie Witkiewitz; Lidia Z Meshesha Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2019-05-09
Authors: James G Murphy; Jessica R Skidmore; Ashley A Dennhardt; Matthew P Martens; Brian Borsari; Nancy P Barnett; Suzanne M Colby Journal: Addict Res Theory Date: 2012