A C Fonseca1, P Canhão. 1. Department of Neurosciences (Neurology), Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal. catarinagfonseca@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is frequently difficult to distinguish transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) from other transient (<24 h) neurological attacks (TNA). We aimed to classify patients with TNA and identify the most frequent problems in establishing a diagnosis. METHODS: Analysis of a consecutive cohort of patients referred to a TIA Clinic during 5 years. TNA were classified as TIA, mimic and difficult to classify/possible TIA. Reasons limiting classification were listed and grouped. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-eight patients were included. Diagnoses were as follows: TIA-259 (56.6%), mimic-90 (19.7%) and difficult to classify/possible TIA-109 (23.8%). Amongst the 109 patients, main difficulties in the differential diagnosis were between TIA and seizure, psychiatric disturbance, peripheral vertigo, pre-syncope and metabolic condition. The reasons contributing for classification difficulties were as follows: atypical symptoms (49 patients), paucity of details in symptoms description (24 patients), presence of focal symptoms accompanying psychiatric symptoms (anxiety or panic) (12 patients), restraints formulated by current criteria of TIA and migraine (16 patients), previous neurological deficit (eight patients). CONCLUSION: This systematic study identified distinct groups of reasons limiting the diagnosis of TNA. Different clinical approaches should be applied according to specific reasons for classification difficulty. These strategies may help to clarify the aetiology of transient neurological symptoms and improve TIA diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: It is frequently difficult to distinguish transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) from other transient (<24 h) neurological attacks (TNA). We aimed to classify patients with TNA and identify the most frequent problems in establishing a diagnosis. METHODS: Analysis of a consecutive cohort of patients referred to a TIA Clinic during 5 years. TNA were classified as TIA, mimic and difficult to classify/possible TIA. Reasons limiting classification were listed and grouped. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-eight patients were included. Diagnoses were as follows: TIA-259 (56.6%), mimic-90 (19.7%) and difficult to classify/possible TIA-109 (23.8%). Amongst the 109 patients, main difficulties in the differential diagnosis were between TIA and seizure, psychiatric disturbance, peripheral vertigo, pre-syncope and metabolic condition. The reasons contributing for classification difficulties were as follows: atypical symptoms (49 patients), paucity of details in symptoms description (24 patients), presence of focal symptoms accompanying psychiatric symptoms (anxiety or panic) (12 patients), restraints formulated by current criteria of TIA and migraine (16 patients), previous neurological deficit (eight patients). CONCLUSION: This systematic study identified distinct groups of reasons limiting the diagnosis of TNA. Different clinical approaches should be applied according to specific reasons for classification difficulty. These strategies may help to clarify the aetiology of transient neurological symptoms and improve TIA diagnosis.
Authors: Adalia H Jun-O'connell; Nils Henninger; Majaz Moonis; Brian Silver; Carolina Ionete; Richard P Goddeau Journal: Neurohospitalist Date: 2019-02-21
Authors: Carla Bentes; Patrícia Canhão; Ana Rita Peralta; Pedro Viana; Ana Catarina Fonseca; Ruth Geraldes; Teresa Pinho E Melo; Teresa Paiva; José Manuel Ferro Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Pract Date: 2017-10-18
Authors: Austin G Milton; Stephan Lau; Karlea L Kremer; Sushma R Rao; Emilie Mas; Marten F Snel; Paul J Trim; Deeksha Sharma; Suzanne Edwards; Mark Jenkinson; Timothy Kleinig; Erik Noschka; Monica Anne Hamilton-Bruce; Simon A Koblar Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: L Servaas Dolmans; Frans H Rutten; Marie-Louise El Bartelink; Gerdien Seppenwoolde; Sanne van Delft; L Jaap Kappelle; Arno W Hoes Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Louis Servaas Dolmans; Frans Rutten; Marie-Louise E L Bartelink; Ewoud J van Dijk; Paul J Nederkoorn; Jaap Kappelle; Arno W Hoes Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 2.692