Literature DB >> 20955280

Patient perceptions of remote monitoring for nocturnal home hemodialysis.

Joseph A Cafazzo1, Kevin Leonard, Anthony C Easty, Peter G Rossos, Christopher T Chan.   

Abstract

Adoption of nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHHD) has been slow, due in part to patient-perceived barriers, such as anxiety and lack of self-efficacy. This study investigates patient perception of remote monitoring in addressing these barriers. Perceptions of remote patient monitoring (RPM) were studied through a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews. The NHHD and conventional hemodialysis (CHD) were included in the survey (209 in total). Twenty semistructured interviews were conducted as well as a focus group that included NHHD patients and family caregivers. The CHD patients had greater interest in adopting NHHD with RPM than without (1.90±1.37 vs. 1.71±1.28, P<0.002), with the negative intensity ratio declining from 10.50 to 5.56. Interest in RPM was correlated with interest in NHHD (r=0.768, P<0.001). Other significant factors correlated with interest in NHHD include the belief that remote monitoring will ease the performing of NHHD (r=0.452, P=0.001) and the belief that RPM should be mandatory (r=0.541, P=0.000). Qualitative findings supported three themes: (1) There is an expectation for the use of RPM, (2) RPM should be used at a minimum transitionally, and (3) RPM acts as a surrogate support of family-caregivers. The RPM may lower perceived barriers to the adoption of NHHD, in part through its surrogate support of family caregivers. However, RPM alone is likely insufficient to alter patients' attitudes to undergo NHHD. RPM is a common expectation of CHD patients considering the therapy, at a minimum during the transitional phase.
© 2010 The Authors. Hemodialysis International © 2010 International Society for Hemodialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20955280     DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2010.00473.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  10 in total

1.  Qualitative studies enrich telemonitoring research, practice, and technology design.

Authors:  Joseph A Cafazzo; Emily Seto; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  Prim Care Respir J       Date:  2012-03

2.  Managing Kidney Failure with Home Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Ali Ibrahim; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Perceptions and experiences of heart failure patients and clinicians on the use of mobile phone-based telemonitoring.

Authors:  Emily Seto; Kevin J Leonard; Joseph A Cafazzo; Jan Barnsley; Caterina Masino; Heather J Ross
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Supporting the Establishment of New Home Dialysis Programs Through the Explore Home Dialysis Program.

Authors:  Plinio P Morita; Kathy Huynh; Areeba Zakir; Joseph A Cafazzo; Rory F McQuillan; Joanne M Bargman; Christopher T M Chan
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2018-10-29

5.  Nephrologists' perspectives on dialysis treatment: results of an international survey.

Authors:  Richard J Fluck; Denis Fouque; Robert S Lockridge
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Patients' and carers' experiences of interacting with home haemodialysis technology: implications for quality and safety.

Authors:  Atish Rajkomar; Ken Farrington; Astrid Mayer; Diane Walker; Ann Blandford
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Web Health Monitoring Survey: A New Approach to Enhance the Effectiveness of Telemedicine Systems.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Romano; Maria Vittoria Sardella; Fabrizio Alboni
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-06-06

8.  Remote Patient Management for Home Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Eric L Wallace; Mitchell H Rosner; Mark Dominik Alscher; Claus Peter Schmitt; Arsh Jain; Francesca Tentori; Catherine Firanek; Karen S Rheuban; Jose Florez-Arango; Vivekanand Jha; Marjorie Foo; Koen de Blok; Mark R Marshall; Mauricio Sanabria; Timothy Kudelka; James A Sloand
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2017-07-29

Review 9.  Opportunities in the cloud or pie in the sky? Current status and future perspectives of telemedicine in nephrology.

Authors:  Madelena Stauss; Lauren Floyd; Stefan Becker; Arvind Ponnusamy; Alexander Woywodt
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-08-14

Review 10.  The Potential Burden of Home Dialysis on Patients and Caregivers: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sabriella Jacquet; Emilie Trinh
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2019-12-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.