Literature DB >> 20955122

Influenza A testing and detection in patients admitted through emergency departments in Sydney during winter 2009: implications for rational testing.

Andrew Jardine1, Stephen J Conaty, Michelle A Cretikos, Wei-Yuen Su, Iain B Gosbell, Sebastiaan J van Hal.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine factors associated with testing and detection of influenza A in patients admitted to hospital for acute care during the winter 2009 pandemic influenza outbreak. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective observational study of patients who were tested for influenza A after being admitted to hospital through emergency departments of the Sydney South West Area Health Service from 15 June to 30 August 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The association of factors such as age, diagnosis at admission, hospital and week of admission with rates of testing and detection of influenza A.
RESULTS: 17,681 patients were admitted through nine emergency departments; 1344 (7.6%) were tested for influenza A, of whom 356 (26.5%) tested positive for pandemic influenza. Testing rates were highest in 0-4-year-old children, in the peak period of the outbreak, and in patients presenting with a febrile or respiratory illness. Positive influenza test results were common across a range of diagnoses, but occurred most frequently in children aged 10-14 years (64.3%) and in patients with a diagnosis at admission of influenza-like illness (59.1%). Using multivariate logistic regression, patients with a diagnosis at admission of fever or a respiratory illness at admission were most likely to be tested (odds ratios [ORs], 15 [95% CI, 11-21] and 17 [95% CI, 15-19], respectively). These diagnoses were stronger predictors of influenza testing than the peak testing week (Week 4; OR, 7.0 [95% CI, 3.8-13]) or any age group. However, diagnosis at admission and age were significant but weak predictors of a positive test result, and the strongest predictor of a positive test result was the peak epidemic week (Week 3; OR, 120 [95% CI, 27-490]).
CONCLUSION: The strongest predictor of a clinician's decision to test for influenza was the diagnosis at admission, but the strongest predictor of a positive test was the week of admission. A rational approach to influenza testing for patients who are admitted to hospital for acute care could include active tracking of influenza testing and detection rates, testing patients with a strong indication for antiviral treatment, and admitting only those who test negative to "clean" wards during the peak of an outbreak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20955122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  2 in total

1.  Reality check of laboratory service effectiveness during pandemic (H1N1) 2009, Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Michael Catton; Julian Druce; Goergina Papadakis; Thomas Tran; Christopher Birch
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.883

2.  Pneumonia among adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed seasonal influenza virus infection-United States, 2005-2008.

Authors:  Shikha Garg; Seema Jain; Fatimah S Dawood; Michael Jhung; Alejandro Pérez; Tiffany D'Mello; Arthur Reingold; Ken Gershman; James Meek; Kathryn E Arnold; Monica M Farley; Patricia Ryan; Ruth Lynfield; Craig Morin; Joan Baumbach; Emily B Hancock; Shelley Zansky; Nancy Bennett; Ann Thomas; William Schaffner; Lyn Finelli
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.090

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.