Literature DB >> 20954672

Mortality following revision joint arthroplasty: is age a factor?

Thomas K Fehring1, Susan M Odum, Keith Fehring, Bryan D Springer, William L Griffin, Anne C Dennos.   

Abstract

With the demand for total joint arthroplasty and overall life expectancy increasing, there will be an increase in the need for revision arthroplasty surgeries. Given that revision joint surgeries are more demanding for both surgeon and patient with longer operative times, increased blood loss, and multiple patient comorbidities, the current mindset is that older patients who undergo a total hip revision or total knee revision have higher mortality rates than younger patients. We identified 1737 revision total joint patients who were at least 2 years postoperative for inclusion in the study. The overall perioperative mortality rate (defined as deaths occurring between 0 and 3 months following revision joint surgery) was calculated and then stratified by revision knee surgery, revision hip surgery, and age. In addition, mortality rates were compared for patients younger than 70 years, between 70 and 80 years and older than 80 years. The overall perioperative mortality rate after revision total hip or knee surgery was 0.7%. After stratifying by age, the perioperative mortality rate was 0.2% in patients younger than 70 years, 0.8% in patients 70 to 79 years, and 2.63% in patients older than 80 years. Of the 1737 patients, 541 died >1 year following their revision surgery at an average time to death of 6.9 years. The observed perioperative mortality rates following revision total joint surgery at a single center were extremely low among all age groups. Therefore, the age of patients undergoing revision surgery should not be the sole determinant of perioperative survival. Additionally, it appears that the mean postoperative survival noted here seems to justify the additional resources used in revision surgery regardless of age. As limited resources exert pressure on an already overburdened healthcare system, rationing of care for certain procedures may ensue using age as a specific criteria. This study should add clarity to this issue. Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20954672     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100826-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  Total hip arthroplasty via the anterior approach: tips and tricks for primary and revision surgery.

Authors:  Philip J York; Charles T Smarck; Thierry Judet; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  CORR Insights®: Long-term Mortality After Revision THA.

Authors:  John B Meding
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Early death following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark D Jones; Michael Parry; Michael Whitehouse; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-13

4.  Mortality After Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Large Integrated Health Care System.

Authors:  Maria C S Inacio; Mark T Dillon; Alex Miric; Ronald A Navarro; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

5.  In-hospital mortality risk for total shoulder arthroplasty: A comprehensive review of the medicare database from 2005 to 2011.

Authors:  Frank McCormick; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Emmanouil B S Kiriakopoulos; William W Schairer; Matthew T Provencher; Jonathan Levy
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: High Perioperative Mortality and Complications.

Authors:  Courtney E Baker; Brian P Chalmers; Michael J Taunton; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Adam W Amundson; Daniel J Berry; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.435

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.