Literature DB >> 2095443

A self-study of clinical evaluation in the McMaster clerkship.

G S Cohen1, N L Henry, P E Dodd.   

Abstract

The McMaster University Undergraduate MD Program participated with nine other schools in a pilot self-study of clinical evaluation under the auspices of the Association of American Medical Colleges. Clerkship planners and teaching faculty responded to questionnaires provided by the AAMC Clinical Evaluation Program, dealing with evaluation system problems. Top ranked problems, as perceived by the McMaster faculty, are presented and compared with the major problem areas seen by the overall group of the nine other schools. Two of these items deal with: (1) the lack of transmission of evaluative information about clerks from one unit to subsequent ones; and (2) faculty unwillingness to record negative evaluations. The former is seen as a serious problem both at McMaster and at the other schools; the latter only at McMaster. The discussion focuses on attempts to explain why these problems exist at McMaster and offers some suggestions for dealing with them.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2095443     DOI: 10.3109/01421599009006630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  4 in total

1.  Detection of Residents With Progress Issues Using a Keyword-Specific Algorithm.

Authors:  Gaby Tremblay; Pierre-Hugues Carmichael; Jean Maziade; Mireille Grégoire
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

2.  The Purpose, Structure, and Process of Clinical Competency Committees: Guidance for Members and Program Directors.

Authors:  Andem Ekpenyong; Jamie S Padmore; Karen E Hauer
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Relating professionalism and conscientiousness to develop an objective, scalar, proxy measure of professionalism in anaesthetic trainees.

Authors:  M A Sawdon; K Whitehouse; G M Finn; J C McLachlan; D Murray
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Capturing the impact of cultural differences in residency.

Authors:  Douglas Archibald; Alison Eyre; Dorota Szczepanik; Joseph K Burns; Lionel Laroche
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.