| Literature DB >> 20953400 |
Chang-Wei Hsieh1, Jih-Huah Wu, Chao-Hsien Hsieh, Qwa-Fun Wang, Jyh-Horng Chen.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to compare the distinct cerebral activation with continued wave (CW) and 10 Hz-modulated wave (MW) stimulation during low-level laser acupuncture. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies were performed to investigate the possible mechanism during laser acupuncture stimulation at the left foot's yongquan (K1) acupoint. There are 12 healthy right-handed volunteers for each type of laser stimulation (10-Hz-Modulated wave: 8 males and 4 females; continued wave: 9 males and 3 females). The analysis of multisubjects in this experiment was applied by random-effect (RFX) analysis. In CW groups, significant activations were found within the inferior parietal lobule, the primary somatosensory cortex, and the precuneus of left parietal lobe. Medial and superior frontal gyrus of left frontal lobe were also aroused. In MW groups, significant activations were found within the primary motor cortex and middle temporal gyrus of left hemisphere and bilateral cuneus. Placebo stimulation did not show any activation. Most activation areas were involved in the functions of memory, attention, and self-consciousness. The results showed the cerebral hemodynamic responses of two laser acupuncture stimulation modes and implied that its mechanism was not only based upon afferent sensory information processing, but that it also had the hemodynamic property altered during external stimulation.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20953400 PMCID: PMC2952336 DOI: 10.1155/2011/951258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Laser acupuncture paradigm design. The paradigm was block design with two conditions (Laser irradiation: A; Laser off: R) and each block was lasted 1-minute (15 scans). Total scan time was 6 minutes (90 scans).
Activation clusters of continued-wave laser stimulation versus placebo group resulta.
| Laser stimulation type | Anatomical Locations |
|
| Cluster sizeb | MNI-coordinates of max value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Continued wave | L Parietal Lobe, Inferior Parietal Lobule | .001 | 4.37 | 144 | −48 | −46 | 44 |
| L Parietal Lobe, Postcentral Gyrus, BA 1 | .001 | 4.26 | 123 | −42 | −34 | 66 | |
| L Parietal Lobe, Postcentral Gyrus, BA 2 | |||||||
| L Parietal Lobe, Precuneus, BA 7 | .002 | 3.63 | 98 | −12 | −62 | 46 | |
| L Frontal Lobe, Medial Frontal Gyrus | .002 | 3.59 | 173 | −6 | −8 | 56 | |
| L Frontal Lobe, Superior Frontal Gyrus, BA 6 | |||||||
aActivation areas of random effects analysis for clusters which surpassed a threshold of P < .01 uncorrected, and degrees of freedom = 11.
bEach voxel size = 2∗2∗2 mm3, and spatial extent threshold >20 voxels.
Activation clusters of continued-wave versus 10 Hz-modulation laser stimulations group resultla.
| Laser stimulation type | Anatomical locations |
|
| Cluster sizeb | MNI-coordinates of max value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Continued wave versus | L Parietal Lobe, Inferior Parietal Lobule, BA 40 | .004 | 3.27 | 47 | −46 | −46 | 44 |
| modulated wave | L Parietal Lobe, Supramarginal Gyrus, BA 40 | ||||||
aActivation areas of random effects analysis for clusters which surpassed a threshold of P < .01 uncorrected, and degrees of freedom = 11.
bEach voxel size = 2∗2∗2 mm3, and spatial extent threshold >20 voxels.
Figure 2Significant activations for continued wave stimulation included the inferior parietal lobule, the primary somatosensory cortex, and the precuneus of left parietal lobe. Medial and Superior frontal gyrus of left frontal lobe.
Activation clusters of 10 Hz-modulation laser stimulation versus placebo group resulta.
| Laser stimulation type | Anatomical Locations |
|
| Cluster sizeb | MNI-coordinates of max value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Modulated wave | L Frontal Lobe, Precentral Gyrus | .000 | 6.45 | 89 | −60 | −4 | 32 |
| L Parietal Lobe, Postcentral Gyrus, BA 3 | |||||||
| L Temporal Lobe, Middle Temporal Gyrus | .000 | 5.52 | 25 | −36 | −76 | 18 | |
| L Occipital Lobe, Cuneus, BA 18 | .000 | 5.28 | 66 | −18 | −80 | 22 | |
| R Occipital Lobe, Cuneus | .000 | 4.49 | 31 | 24 | −86 | 16 | |
aActivation areas of random effects analysis for clusters which surpassed a threshold of P < .002 uncorrected, and degrees of freedom = 11.
bEach voxel size = 2∗2∗2 mm3, and spatial extent threshold >20 voxels.
Figure 3Significant activations for modulated wave stimulation included the primary motor cortex and middle temporal gyrus of left hemisphere and bilateral cuneus.
Figure 4Significant activations for continued wave stimulation versus modulated wave stimulation included the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) (BA 40) and the left supramarginal gyrus (BA 40).
Figure 5The same K1 acupoint irradiation with modulated and nonmodulated low-level laser aroused different activations in brain. (CW: continued wave; MW: 10 Hz modulation).