| Literature DB >> 2095281 |
R L Walker1, R T Greene, T M Gerig.
Abstract
Four commercial anaerobic systems (CASs) were evaluated for usefulness in identification of Eubacterium suis. Twelve strains were evaluated in each system in triplicate, and results were interpreted independently by 5 individuals. Statistically significant differences (P less than 0.01) due to strain variation and reader interpretation accounted for discrepancies encountered. The reactivity, repeatability, and unique profiles generated made both CAS-1 and CAS-2 suitable adjuncts for identification of E. suis when colony morphology and Gram reaction were considered. Limited reactivity in CAS-3 limited its use as an aid in identification. Variability in test observations and the large number of numerical profiles generated precluded use of CAS-4.Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 1990 PMID： 2095281 DOI： 10.1177/104063879000200412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Diagn Invest ISSN： 1040-6387 Impact factor: 1.279