Quan Gan1, Stanton A Glantz. 1. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the Chinese tobacco industry and academic institutions in China. METHODS: We searched online databases of journal articles published in both Chinese and English for academic institutions in China conducting research with or sponsored by Chinese tobacco companies. We also searched the websites of tobacco companies, their affiliated institutions and academic institutions for reports of collaborations. RESULTS: The Chinese tobacco industry, in addition to its own strong tobacco research capacity, maintains close ties with an extensive network of academic research institutions and universities to provide both research and training. The Chinese tobacco industry relies heavily upon academic researchers to advance its research agenda and such reliance has grown over time. Most research deals with farming, manufacturing and management issues, but research on 'reduced harm' and health effects has increased from 1% of projects in 1983-1987 to 4% in 2003-2007. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese academic institutions should consider the fact that engagement with the tobacco industry, particularly on issues related to health or promotion of tobacco products, could damage their reputations, a concern that has led many leading Western universities to eschew relationships with the tobacco industry. To the extent that the Chinese tobacco industry's involvement in academic institutions affects tobacco control policy making; it violates Article 5.3 of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which China ratified in 2005.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the Chinese tobacco industry and academic institutions in China. METHODS: We searched online databases of journal articles published in both Chinese and English for academic institutions in China conducting research with or sponsored by Chinese tobacco companies. We also searched the websites of tobacco companies, their affiliated institutions and academic institutions for reports of collaborations. RESULTS: The Chinese tobacco industry, in addition to its own strong tobacco research capacity, maintains close ties with an extensive network of academic research institutions and universities to provide both research and training. The Chinese tobacco industry relies heavily upon academic researchers to advance its research agenda and such reliance has grown over time. Most research deals with farming, manufacturing and management issues, but research on 'reduced harm' and health effects has increased from 1% of projects in 1983-1987 to 4% in 2003-2007. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese academic institutions should consider the fact that engagement with the tobacco industry, particularly on issues related to health or promotion of tobacco products, could damage their reputations, a concern that has led many leading Western universities to eschew relationships with the tobacco industry. To the extent that the Chinese tobacco industry's involvement in academic institutions affects tobacco control policy making; it violates Article 5.3 of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which China ratified in 2005.
Authors: Quan Gan; Jie Yang; Gonghuan Yang; Maciej Goniewicz; Neal L Benowitz; Stanton A Glantz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Quan Gan; Wei Lu; Jiying Xu; Xinjian Li; Maciej Goniewicz; Neal L Benowitz; Stanton A Glantz Journal: Tob Control Date: 2010-05-27 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Bianca Kusma; Cristian Scutaru; David Quarcoo; Tobias Welte; Tanja C Fischer; Beatrix Groneberg-Kloft Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 3.390