BACKGROUND: Treatment of central nervous system relapse in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a challenge and outcome is poor. Liposomal cytarabine has a prolonged half-life and, given intrathecally, has produced high response rates in patients with central nervous system relapse of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of liposomal cytarabine in central nervous system relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia or Burkitt's lymphoma/leukemia. DESIGN AND METHODS: Liposomal cytarabine (50 mg) was given intrathecally together with systemic or intrathecal dexamethasone once every 2 weeks in a phase II European trial. The primary end-point, cytological response in the cerebrospinal fluid after one or two cycles, was evaluated at the time of next treatment. RESULTS: Nineteen heavily pretreated patients (median age, 53 years; range 24-76 years) were evaluable: 14 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 5 with Burkitt's lymphoma/leukemia). Complete cytological remission as best response after two cycles of liposomal cytarabine was confirmed in 74% of the patients: 86% of those with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 40% of those with Burkitt's lymphoma/leukemia). Nine of the 14 patients who achieved complete remission relapsed after a median of 7 months. The median overall survival was 11 months. Adverse events were observed in 89% of the patients (57% of cycles). Grade III-IV events with potential correlation to liposomal cytarabine occurred in 32% of the patients. The most frequent adverse event was headache. One patient developed severe neurological complications with loss of vision and a conus syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, liposomal cytarabine showed excellent antileukemic activity. Toxicity was acceptable but appeared to increase with the number of cycles. Future evaluation in prophylaxis is of interest.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of central nervous system relapse in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a challenge and outcome is poor. Liposomal cytarabine has a prolonged half-life and, given intrathecally, has produced high response rates in patients with central nervous system relapse of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of liposomal cytarabine in central nervous system relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia or Burkitt's lymphoma/leukemia. DESIGN AND METHODS: Liposomal cytarabine (50 mg) was given intrathecally together with systemic or intrathecal dexamethasone once every 2 weeks in a phase II European trial. The primary end-point, cytological response in the cerebrospinal fluid after one or two cycles, was evaluated at the time of next treatment. RESULTS: Nineteen heavily pretreated patients (median age, 53 years; range 24-76 years) were evaluable: 14 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 5 with Burkitt's lymphoma/leukemia). Complete cytological remission as best response after two cycles of liposomal cytarabine was confirmed in 74% of the patients: 86% of those with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 40% of those with Burkitt's lymphoma/leukemia). Nine of the 14 patients who achieved complete remission relapsed after a median of 7 months. The median overall survival was 11 months. Adverse events were observed in 89% of the patients (57% of cycles). Grade III-IV events with potential correlation to liposomal cytarabine occurred in 32% of the patients. The most frequent adverse event was headache. One patient developed severe neurological complications with loss of vision and a conus syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, liposomal cytarabine showed excellent antileukemic activity. Toxicity was acceptable but appeared to increase with the number of cycles. Future evaluation in prophylaxis is of interest.
Authors: M J Glantz; S LaFollette; K A Jaeckle; W Shapiro; L Swinnen; J R Rozental; S Phuphanich; L R Rogers; J C Gutheil; T Batchelor; D Lyter; M Chamberlain; B L Maria; C Schiffer; R Bashir; D Thomas; W Cowens; S B Howell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Usha R Surapaneni; Jorge E Cortes; Deborah Thomas; Susan O'Brien; Francis J Giles; Charles Koller; Stefan Faderl; Hagop Kantarjian Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jose A Garcia-Marco; Carlos Panizo; Eva Sanchez Garcia; Guillermo Deben; Alberto Alvarez-Larran; Eva Gonzalez Barca; Juan Manuel Sancho; Maria Jesus Penarrubia; Tomas Garcia-Cerecedo; Jose A Garcia Vela Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: L Bomgaars; J R Geyer; J Franklin; G Dahl; J Park; N J Winick; R Klenke; S L Berg; S M Blaney Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Francisco-Javier Peñalver; Juan-Manuel Sancho; Adolfo de la Fuente; María-Teresa Olave; Alejandro Martín; Carlos Panizo; Elena Pérez; Antonio Salar; Alberto Orfao Journal: Haematologica Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: M J Fowler; J D Cotter; B E Knight; E M Sevick-Muraca; D I Sandberg; R W Sirianni Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Wojciech Jurczak; Renata Kroll-Balcerzak; Sebastian Giebel; Maciej Machaczka; Agnieszka Giza; Tomasz Ogórka; Szymon Fornagiel; Justyna Rybka; Tomasz Wróbel; Beata Kumiega; Aleksander B Skotnicki; Mieczysław Komarnicki Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.064