Literature DB >> 20952491

Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?

Jeffrey T Berger1.   

Abstract

The 'best interests' decision making standard is used in clinical care to make necessary health decisions for non-capacitated individuals for whom neither explicit nor inferred wishes are known. It has been also widely acknowledged as a basis for enrolling some non-capacitated adults into clinical research such as emergency, critical care, and dementia research. However, the best interests standard requires that choices provide the highest net benefit of available options, and clinical research rarely meets this criterion. In the context of modern norms of bioethics, the best interests standard rarely supports surrogate consent for research and should not be accepted as a routine provision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952491     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.037515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

1.  Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research.

Authors:  Julia T Newman; Alexandra Smart; Tyler R Reese; Andre Williams; Marc Moss
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on 'evidence biased' medicine.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 3.  The theorisation of 'best interests' in bioethical accounts of decision-making.

Authors:  Giles Birchley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Non-beneficial pediatric research: individual and social interests.

Authors:  Jan Piasecki; Marcin Waligora; Vilius Dranseika
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02

5.  Child's objection to non-beneficial research: capacity and distress based models.

Authors:  Marcin Waligora; Joanna Różyńska; Jan Piasecki
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-03

6.  A protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission.

Authors:  Petra Mäkelä; Mary Godfrey; Andrea Cradduck-Bamford; Graham Ellis; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Healthcare professionals' understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd; Richard Griffith; Mark Sheehan; Fiona Wood; Kerenza Hood
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.926

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.