Literature DB >> 20952099

Reperfusion is delayed beyond guideline recommendations in patients requiring interhospital helicopter transfer for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Jason T McMullan1, William Hinckley, Jared Bentley, Todd Davis, Gregory J Fermann, Matthew Gunderman, Kimberly Ward Hart, William A Knight, Christopher J Lindsell, April Shackleford, W Brian Gibler.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Early reperfusion portends better outcomes for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. This investigation estimates the proportions of STEMI patients transported by a hospital-based helicopter emergency medical services (EMS) system who meet the goals of 90-minute door-to-balloon time for percutaneous coronary intervention or 30-minute door-to-needle time for fibrinolysis.
METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review of STEMI patients flown by a hospital-based helicopter service in 2007. Included patients were transferred from an emergency department (ED) to a cardiac catheterization laboratory for primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention. Out-of-hospital, ED, and inpatient records were reviewed to determine door-to-balloon time and door-to-needle time. Data were abstracted with a priori definitions and criteria.
RESULTS: There were 179 subjects from 16 referring and 6 receiving hospitals. Mean age was 58 years, 68% were men, and 86% were white. One hundred forty subjects were transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention, of whom 29 had no intervention during catheterization. For subjects with intervention, door-to-balloon time exceeded 90 minutes in 107 of 111 cases (97%). Median door-to-balloon time was 131 minutes (interquartile range 114 to 158 minutes). Thirty-nine subjects (21%) received fibrinolytics before transfer, and 19 of 39 (49%) received fibrinolytics within 30 minutes. Median door-to-needle time was 31 minutes (interquartile range 23 to 45 minutes).
CONCLUSION: In this study, STEMI patients presenting to non-percutaneous coronary intervention facilities who are transferred to a percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospital by helicopter EMS do not commonly receive fibrinolysis and rarely achieve percutaneous coronary intervention within 90 minutes. In similar settings, primary fibrinolysis should be considered while strategies to reduce the time required for subsequent interventional care are explored.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952099     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  5 in total

1.  Ground emergency medical services requests for helicopter transfer of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients decrease medical contact to balloon times in rural and suburban settings.

Authors:  Jason T McMullan; William Hinckley; Jared Bentley; Todd Davis; Gregory J Fermann; Matthew Gunderman; Kimberly Ward Hart; William A Knight; Christopher J Lindsell; Chris Miller; April Shackleford; W Brian Gibler
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Decreasing door-to-balloon times via a streamlined referral protocol for patients requiring transport.

Authors:  Andrew P Reimer; Fredric M Hustey; Damon Kralovic
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Paramedic-initiated helivac to tertiary hospital for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a strategy for improving treatment delivery times.

Authors:  Paul Davis; Graham J Howie; Bridget Dicker; Nicholas K Garrett
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Helicopter EMS: Research Endpoints and Potential Benefits.

Authors:  Stephen H Thomas; Annette O Arthur
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.112

5.  Assessment of Transportation by Air for Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction from Non-PCI Centers.

Authors:  Angel Liviu Trifan; Liliana Dragomir; Mihaela Anghele; Eva Maria Elkan; Sorina Munteanu; Cosmina Moscu; Valerian-Ionuț Stoian; Anca Telehuz; Monica Laura Zlati; Mihaiela Lungu; Doina Carina Voinescu; Diana Carmen Cimpoesu; Gabriela Stoleriu; Ion Sandu; Violeta Sapira
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.