Bassem S Wadie1. 1. Urology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. Bassem_wadie@mans.edu.eg
Abstract
PURPOSE: Post-prostatectomy incontinence is usually due to sphincter damage as a complication of prostatectomy but may result from other causes. The intermediate term outcome of the retropubic bulbourethral sling is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in study were 40 men with post-prostatectomy incontinence who used 5 or greater pads daily for protection. All patients had undergone prostatectomy, including transurethral resection in 17, holmium laser enucleation in 3, and open retropubic and radical prostatectomy in 12 and 8, respectively. Preoperatively voiding cystourethrogram and urodynamics were done in all men as applicable. A bulbourethral sling was prepared from polypropylene mesh. Suspension was achieved using size zero nylon sutures to fix the mesh in front of the rectus sheath. Patients were followed at 1 week, 3 and 6 months, and semiannually thereafter. RESULTS: Median incontinence duration was 3 years (range 0.5 to 14). Concomitant surgery was done in 11 men (27.5%), 34 (85%) were dry at 24-month followup and 10 (25%) underwent retightening at 3 to 6 months. Urodynamics showed no significant change in filling or voiding parameters. The increase in maximum urethral closure pressure and functional urethral length was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The described retropubic bulbourethral sling is a viable option for severe male incontinence with a satisfactory cure rate at intermediate followup. It is adjustable and cost-effective.
PURPOSE: Post-prostatectomy incontinence is usually due to sphincter damage as a complication of prostatectomy but may result from other causes. The intermediate term outcome of the retropubic bulbourethral sling is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in study were 40 men with post-prostatectomy incontinence who used 5 or greater pads daily for protection. All patients had undergone prostatectomy, including transurethral resection in 17, holmium laser enucleation in 3, and open retropubic and radical prostatectomy in 12 and 8, respectively. Preoperatively voiding cystourethrogram and urodynamics were done in all men as applicable. A bulbourethral sling was prepared from polypropylene mesh. Suspension was achieved using size zero nylon sutures to fix the mesh in front of the rectus sheath. Patients were followed at 1 week, 3 and 6 months, and semiannually thereafter. RESULTS: Median incontinence duration was 3 years (range 0.5 to 14). Concomitant surgery was done in 11 men (27.5%), 34 (85%) were dry at 24-month followup and 10 (25%) underwent retightening at 3 to 6 months. Urodynamics showed no significant change in filling or voiding parameters. The increase in maximum urethral closure pressure and functional urethral length was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The described retropubic bulbourethral sling is a viable option for severe male incontinence with a satisfactory cure rate at intermediate followup. It is adjustable and cost-effective.
Authors: Alexander Kretschmer; Alexander Buchner; Benedikt Leitl; Markus Grabbert; Anne Sommer; Wael Khoder; Christian Gozzi; Christian G Stief; Ricarda M Bauer Journal: Int Neurourol J Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 2.835