Literature DB >> 20951815

Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from the feces of breast-fed infants and Taiwanese pickled cabbage.

Chung-Yi Wang1, Pei-Rong Lin, Chang-Chai Ng, Yuan-Tay Shyu.   

Abstract

This study assessed potential probiotic Lactobacillus strains isolated from the feces of breast-fed infants and from Taiwanese pickled cabbage for their possible use in probiotic fermented foods by evaluating their (i) in vitro adhesive ability, resistance to biotic stress, resistance to pathogenic bacteria, and production of β-galactosidase; (ii) milk technological properties; and (iii) in vivo adhesive ability, intestinal survival and microbial changes during and after treatment. Five Lactobacillus isolates identified as Lactobacillus reuteri F03, Lactobacillus paracasei F08, Lactobacillus rhamnosus F14, Lactobacillus plantarum C06, and Lactobacillus acidophilus C11 that showed resistance to gastric juice and bile salts were selected for further evaluation of their probiotic properties. All the strains demonstrated the ability to adhere to Caco-2 cells, particularly, strain L. plantarum C06 and L. reuteri F03 showed satisfactory abilities, which were similar to that of the reference strain L. rhamnosus GG. The strains L. paracasei F08 and L. acidophilus C11 had the highest β-galactosidase activity. Most of the strains were resistant to aminoglycosides and vancomycin but sensitive to ampicillin, erythromycin, and penicillin. All the 5 strains elicited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive (Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus) and -negative (Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica) pathogens. Moreover, the strains L. reuteri F03, L. paracasei F08, and L. plantarum C06 could grow rapidly in milk without nutrient supplementation and reached 10⁸ cfu/mL after 24 h of fermentation at 37 °C. The viable cell counts of the 3 strains remained above 10⁷ cfu/mL after 21 d of storage at 4 °C. In the animal feeding trial, the number of intestinal lactobacilli increased significantly after administration of milk fermented with the 3 strains, and the counts of fecal coliforms and Clostridium perfringens were markedly reduced. Lactobacillus strains could also survive in the ileal intestinal tissue of the treated rats. Technologically interesting Lactobacillus isolates may be used in the future as probiotic starter cultures for manufacturing novel fermented foods. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20951815     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  25 in total

1.  Characterization of a Newly Isolated Probiotic Strain from Oecophylla smaragdina, an Edible Insect Popular Among the Indigenous Communities of Northeast India.

Authors:  Debajit Borah; Pronami Gogoi; Dipti Agarwal; Ankita Khataniar
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Probiotic attributes of indigenous Lactobacillus spp. isolated from traditional fermented foods and beverages of north-western Himalayas using in vitro screening and principal component analysis.

Authors:  Anila Kumari; Kunzes Angmo; Tek Chand Bhalla
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  In vitro screening of selected probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from traditional fermented cabbage and cucumber.

Authors:  Dorota Zielińska; Anna Rzepkowska; Anna Radawska; Konrad Zieliński
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Evaluating the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains from Algerian Infant Feces: Towards the Design of Probiotic Starter Cultures Tailored for Developing Countries.

Authors:  Chahira Gheziel; Pasquale Russo; Mattia Pia Arena; Giuseppe Spano; Hadda-Imene Ouzari; Omar Kheroua; Djamel Saidi; Daniela Fiocco; Hanane Kaddouri; Vittorio Capozzi
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Characteristics of Bacterial Isolates from the Gut of Freshwater Fish, Labeo rohita that May be Useful as Potential Probiotic Bacteria.

Authors:  Sib Sankar Giri; V Sukumaran; Nitesh Kumar Dangi
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Real-time PCR analysis of the intestinal microbiotas in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  I-Kuan Wang; Hsueh-Chou Lai; Cheng-Ju Yu; Chih-Chia Liang; Chiz-Tzung Chang; Huey-Liang Kuo; Ya-Fei Yang; Chung-Chih Lin; Hsin-Hung Lin; Yao-Lung Liu; Yi-Chih Chang; Yi-Ying Wu; Chu-Huang Chen; Chi-Yuan Li; Feng-Rong Chuang; Chiu-Ching Huang; Chih-Hsueh Lin; Hung-Chih Lin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  In vitro probiotic evaluation of phytase producing Lactobacillus species isolated from Uttapam batter and their application in soy milk fermentation.

Authors:  Appukuttan Saraniya; Kadirvelu Jeevaratnam
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.701

8.  Screening of immunomodulatory and adhesive Lactobacillus with antagonistic activities against Salmonella from fermented vegetables.

Authors:  Junchang Feng; Pilong Liu; Xin Yang; Xin Zhao
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Potential fate of ingested Lactobacillus plantarum and its occurrence in human feces.

Authors:  Giselle Nobre Costa; Francismar Corrêa Marcelino-Guimarães; Gislayne Trindade Vilas-Bôas; Tiemi Matsuo; Lucia Helena S Miglioranza
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Identification and characterisation of the lactic acid bacteria associated with the traditional fermentation of dairy fermented product.

Authors:  Promiselynda Ijeoma Obioha; L Irene I Ouoba; Amarachukwu Anyogu; Brigitte Awamaria; Sarah Atchia; Philippa C Ojimelukwe; Jane P Sutherland; Hamid B Ghoddusi
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.