OBJECTIVE: Studies exploring neuropsychological functions of bipolar disorder (BP) specifically include patients comorbid with alcohol abuse (AB), alcohol dependence (AD), or both (AB/AD). Contradictory assessments of neuropsychological impairment may be caused by not excluding the confounding effects of comorbid AB/AD. Most of the literature discusses BP without subtyping, which overlooks that BP-II may be a valid diagnosis different from BP-I. Because neuropsychological functions are involved in overall BP-II outcomes, we hypothesized that the neuropsychological functions of patients with BP-II comorbid with AD (BP(+AD)) are significantly different from and more impaired than those of patients with BP-II not comorbid with AD (BP(-AD)). METHODS: Using DSM-IV criteria, the study included 69 patients with BP-II (19 with BP(+AD); 28 with BP(-AD)) and 22 healthy controls compared using a battery of neuropsychological tests that assessed memory, psychomotor speed, and certain aspects of frontal executive function. All BP-II patients were in an inter-episode period (a period of remission between states of mania, hypomania, and depression). RESULTS: BP(+AD) patients had lower scores than did BP(-AD) patients and controls in verbal memory, visual memory, attention, psychomotor speed, and executive function. Working memory was poorer for BP(+AD) than BP(-AD) patients and for both BP groups than for controls. CONCLUSIONS: BP(+AD) patients manifested wide neuropsychological dysfunctions, and BP(-AD) patients showed a reduction in working memory, which suggested that working memory might be related to a history of BP-II. Neuropsychological dysfunctions seemed more strongly associated with AB/AD than with BP-II in inter-episode periods.
OBJECTIVE: Studies exploring neuropsychological functions of bipolar disorder (BP) specifically include patients comorbid with alcohol abuse (AB), alcohol dependence (AD), or both (AB/AD). Contradictory assessments of neuropsychological impairment may be caused by not excluding the confounding effects of comorbid AB/AD. Most of the literature discusses BP without subtyping, which overlooks that BP-II may be a valid diagnosis different from BP-I. Because neuropsychological functions are involved in overall BP-II outcomes, we hypothesized that the neuropsychological functions of patients with BP-II comorbid with AD (BP(+AD)) are significantly different from and more impaired than those of patients with BP-II not comorbid with AD (BP(-AD)). METHODS: Using DSM-IV criteria, the study included 69 patients with BP-II (19 with BP(+AD); 28 with BP(-AD)) and 22 healthy controls compared using a battery of neuropsychological tests that assessed memory, psychomotor speed, and certain aspects of frontal executive function. All BP-II patients were in an inter-episode period (a period of remission between states of mania, hypomania, and depression). RESULTS: BP(+AD) patients had lower scores than did BP(-AD) patients and controls in verbal memory, visual memory, attention, psychomotor speed, and executive function. Working memory was poorer for BP(+AD) than BP(-AD) patients and for both BP groups than for controls. CONCLUSIONS: BP(+AD) patients manifested wide neuropsychological dysfunctions, and BP(-AD) patients showed a reduction in working memory, which suggested that working memory might be related to a history of BP-II. Neuropsychological dysfunctions seemed more strongly associated with AB/AD than with BP-II in inter-episode periods.
Authors: Leonardo E Silveira; Jan-Marie Kozicky; Kesavan Muralidharan; Joana Bücker; Ivan J Torres; David J Bond; Flavio Kapczinski; Marcia Kauer-Sant'Anna; Raymond W Lam; Lakshmi N Yatham Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Vicent Balanzá-Martínez; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; Ana González-Pinto; Eduard Vieta Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 4.566