BACKGROUND: Vulnerable carotid plaques are associated with cerebrovascular ischaemic events. High-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging not only allows the morphological assessment of such plaques, but also provides geometrical data, which can be used for biomechanical stress analysis. We assess its utility to assess the plaque stress profiles of symptomatic (transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and non-disabling stroke) and asymptomatic patients. METHODS: A total of 70 consecutive patients with confirmed underlying carotid artery disease underwent carotid MR imaging of their carotid artery in a 1.5-T MR system using a standard carotid atheroma imaging protocol. MR images were manually segmented for different plaque components and used for biomechanical stress analysis. The maximum critical stress (M-CStress) for various clinical groups was determined and compared. RESULTS: M-CStress of symptomatic plaques (n = 45) was significantly higher than for asymptomatic plaques (n = 25) (median (interquartile range (IQR): 275 kPa (190-390) vs. 165 kPa (120-200), p = 0.0001)). Within the symptomatic group, no M-CStress differences were present between the TIA (n = 30) and stroke (n = 15) patients (260 kPa (190-370) vs. 295 kPa (200-510), p = 0.31). Within the TIA patient cohort, those who had presented with recurrent TIAs (n = 6) had significantly higher stresses than patients who had suffered a single episode (n = 24) (425 kPa (285-580) vs. 250 kPa (180-310), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic carotid plaques, particularly those associated with recurrent TIAs, have high biomechanical stresses. As there is pre-existing evidence to suggest that high biomechanical stresses are associated with plaque vulnerability, MR-imaging-based stress analysis has the potential to identify high-risk patients with vulnerable plaques. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: Vulnerable carotid plaques are associated with cerebrovascular ischaemic events. High-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging not only allows the morphological assessment of such plaques, but also provides geometrical data, which can be used for biomechanical stress analysis. We assess its utility to assess the plaque stress profiles of symptomatic (transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and non-disabling stroke) and asymptomatic patients. METHODS: A total of 70 consecutive patients with confirmed underlying carotid artery disease underwent carotid MR imaging of their carotid artery in a 1.5-T MR system using a standard carotid atheroma imaging protocol. MR images were manually segmented for different plaque components and used for biomechanical stress analysis. The maximum critical stress (M-CStress) for various clinical groups was determined and compared. RESULTS: M-CStress of symptomatic plaques (n = 45) was significantly higher than for asymptomatic plaques (n = 25) (median (interquartile range (IQR): 275 kPa (190-390) vs. 165 kPa (120-200), p = 0.0001)). Within the symptomatic group, no M-CStress differences were present between the TIA (n = 30) and stroke (n = 15) patients (260 kPa (190-370) vs. 295 kPa (200-510), p = 0.31). Within the TIA patient cohort, those who had presented with recurrent TIAs (n = 6) had significantly higher stresses than patients who had suffered a single episode (n = 24) (425 kPa (285-580) vs. 250 kPa (180-310), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic carotid plaques, particularly those associated with recurrent TIAs, have high biomechanical stresses. As there is pre-existing evidence to suggest that high biomechanical stresses are associated with plaque vulnerability, MR-imaging-based stress analysis has the potential to identify high-risk patients with vulnerable plaques. Copyright Â
Authors: Raf H M van Hoof; Floris H B M Schreuder; Patty Nelemans; Martine T B Truijman; Narender P van Orshoven; Tobien H Schreuder; Werner H Mess; Sylvia Heeneman; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Joachim E Wildberger; M Eline Kooi Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Zhongzhao Teng; Jing He; Andrew J Degnan; Shengyong Chen; Umar Sadat; Nasim Sheikh Bahaei; James H F Rudd; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Jianmin Yuan; Zhongzhao Teng; Jiaxuan Feng; Yongxue Zhang; Adam J Brown; Jonathan H Gillard; Zaiping Jing; Qingsheng Lu Journal: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Zhongzhao Teng; Umar Sadat; Wenkai Wang; Nasim S Bahaei; Shengyong Chen; Victoria E Young; Martin J Graves; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yuan Huang; Zhongzhao Teng; Umar Sadat; Martin J Graves; Martin R Bennett; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: J Biomech Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 2.712