Literature DB >> 20951448

Reporting guidelines for primary research: Saying what you did.

Annette O'Connor1.   

Abstract

Reporting guidelines aim to facilitate publication of a full and accurate description of research conducted. The motivations for a full and accurate description of research is to enable reproduction of the study, assessment of bias, extraction of data from the study, and to fulfill an ethical obligation to maximize the utility of research findings. Many reporting guidelines exist and most are based on a specific study design such as randomized controlled trials (CONSORT statement) and observational studies (STROBE statement). The REFLECT statement focuses on randomized control trials in livestock and food safety studies. The REFLECT statement has increased emphasis on conveying information about animal housing, group level allocation and challenge studies. Guidelines can be used by authors, reviewers and editors to provide readers with a full and accurate description of the work conducted.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20951448     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  2 in total

1.  A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research.

Authors:  Douglas Jc Grindlay; Rachel S Dean; Mary M Christopher; Marnie L Brennan
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Thomas Fuller; Mark Pearson; Jaime L Peters; Rob Anderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.