Literature DB >> 20951320

Long-term clinical outcome based on aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness status after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a 3T/2R (tailoring treatment with tirofiban in patients showing resistance to aspirin and/or resistance to clopidogrel) trial substudy.

Gianluca Campo1, Luca Fileti, Nicoletta de Cesare, Emanuele Meliga, Alessandro Furgieri, Filippo Russo, Salvatore Colangelo, Salvatore Brugaletta, Roberto Ferrari, Marco Valgimigli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome after elective percutaneous coronary intervention in low-risk patients screened for aspirin and/or clopidogrel responsiveness in the 3T/2R (Tailoring Treatment With Tirofiban in Patients Showing Resistance to Aspirin and/or Resistance to Clopidogrel) trial.
BACKGROUND: The impact of aspirin and/or clopidogrel poor response on long-term outcome is debated.
METHODS: Aspirin and clopidogrel response was measured with the VerifyNow system aspirin and P2Y12 assays. After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), death, stroke, and myocardial infarction were assessed up to 1 year.
RESULTS: Overall, 1,277 patients were screened, and 826 (65%) were treated with PCI. In all, 124 patients were found to be aspirin poor responders, and there were 179 clopidogrel poor responders (totally, 278 poor responders). The 1-year end point was significantly higher in poor responders as compared to full responders (15.8% vs. 8.6%, p=0.002), which is principally due to more myocardial infarction occurrence. At multivariable analysis, clopidogrel poor response emerged as an independent predictor (hazard ratio: 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 1.28). Receiver-operator characteristic analysis identifies≤23 of percentage of platelet inhibition and ≥208 of P2Y12 reactivity units as optimal cut offs to predict 1-year end point. Excluding periprocedural events, also peri-PCI myocardial infarction, which is strongly related to aspirin/clopidogrel poor response, was an independent predictor (hazard ratio: 1.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.14 to 1.37). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration reduces this risk in poor responders (21.2% vs. 34.7%, p=0.02), but not in full responders (6.3% vs. 6.5%, p=0.8).
CONCLUSIONS: Poor response to clopidogrel is an independent predictor of periprocedural myocardial infarction and worse 1-year outcome in low-risk patients undergoing PCI, whereas poor response to aspirin failed to predict a worse outcome. Contrary to what was observed in poor responders, glycoprotein IIb/IIa inhibitor therapy failed to provide a benefit in aspirin and/or clopidogrel full responders.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20951320     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  17 in total

1.  Influence of dual antiplatelet therapy on mean platelet volume in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Tadanao Higaki; Satoshi Kurisu; Noriaki Watanabe; Hiroki Ikenaga; Takashi Shimonaga; Toshitaka Iwasaki; Naoya Mitsuba; Ken Ishibashi; Yoshihiro Dohi; Yukihiro Fukuda; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Antiplatelet therapy: What have we learned from the ANTARCTIC trial?

Authors:  Paul A Gurbel; Udaya S Tantry
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Clopidogrel hyper-response and bleeding risk in neurointerventional procedures.

Authors:  C Goh; L Churilov; P Mitchell; R Dowling; B Yan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Platelet function testing and tailored antiplatelet therapy.

Authors:  Paul W A Janssen; Jurriën M ten Berg
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Personalized antiplatelet therapy: review of the latest clinical evidence.

Authors:  Elise Camilleri; Laurent Jacquin; Franck Paganelli; Laurent Bonello
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Platelet function monitoring and clopidogrel.

Authors:  Andrew R Harper; Matthew J Price
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Current Concepts in the Clinical Utility of Platelet Reactivity Testing.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Collet
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-08

Review 8.  Optimal pediatric dosing of anti-platelet agents for pipeline stent embolization -a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mary In-Ping Huang Cobb; Ali R Zomorodi; Erik F Hauck; Tony P Smith; L Fernando Gonzalez
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 9.  Personalized antiplatelet therapy: state of the art.

Authors:  Paul A Gurbel; Young-Hoon Jeong; Udaya S Tantry
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-09-24

10.  Clopidogrel resistance response in patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome: the role of hyperglycemia and obesity.

Authors:  Zhao-Ke Wu; Jing-Jing Wang; Ting Wang; Shen-Shen Zhu; Xi-Ling Chen; Chao Liu; Wei-Guo Zhang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.