Literature DB >> 20951157

Spatial and temporal stimulus variants for multifocal pupillography of the central visual field.

Faran Sabeti1, Andrew C James, Ted Maddess.   

Abstract

Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) has the advantage of being a non-invasive, objective method for measuring up to 88 visual field responses from both eyes concurrently within 5min. To date mfPOP has been used to assess the peripheral visual field. Here we examine the practicality of mfPOP for testing the macular region of the visual field. This study examines variations in temporal presentation rate, spatial stimulus layout and luminance intensity in a group of normal subjects to determine the optimal parameters for achieving high signal to noise ratios for a macular version of mfPOP. Responses to multifocal stimuli comprising 24 or 44 stimulus regions per eye were measured dichoptically achieving median signal to noise ratios of 2.47 z-score units. Long stimulus presentation intervals combined with 24 region non-overlapping layouts produced the largest contraction amplitudes and shortest response delays.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20951157     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Multifocal pupillography identifies retinal dysfunction in early age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Faran Sabeti; Andrew C James; Rohan W Essex; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Anisotropy in the peripheral visual field based on pupil response to the glare illusion.

Authors:  Novera Istiqomah; Yuta Suzuki; Yuya Kinzuka; Tetsuto Minami; Shigeki Nakauchi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-26

3.  Comparing multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) and multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP) in retinal diseases.

Authors:  Faran Sabeti; Andrew C James; Corinne F Carle; Rohan W Essex; Andrew Bell; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparison of unifocal, flicker, and multifocal pupil perimetry methods in healthy adults.

Authors:  Brendan L Portengen; Giorgio L Porro; Saskia M Imhof; Marnix Naber
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Clustered Volleys Stimulus Presentation for Multifocal Objective Perimetry.

Authors:  Corinne F Carle; Andrew C James; Faran Sabeti; Maria Kolic; Rohan W Essex; Chris Shean; Rhiannon Jeans; Aiasha Saikal; Alice Licinio; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.