INTRODUCTION: To date, most of all new developments in stent technologies are tested in normal animals. Although invaluable in the evaluation of device safety, the juvenile domestic swine (DS) do not follow the biological healing response occurring in humans following coronary stent implantation. By using a novel swine breed afflicted with familial hypercholesterolemia (FHS), we aimed to analyse the vascular response occurring following bare metal stent (BMS) implantation by comparing in vivo endovascular imaging and histological data. METHODS: A total of 26 swine were included in this study (12 FHS and 14 DS). Sixty eight BMS (FHS=28 versus DS=40) were implanted using a 10% overstretch ratio. Imaging evaluation (IVUS and OCT) was conducted in all animals at 30 (n=14) or 90 (n=12) days following stent implantation. After imaging, the stented coronary segments were harvested for histological evaluation. RESULTS: At 30 days, the degree of neointimal formation analysed by OCT (%AS=DS 21.9 ± 10% versus FHS 25.4 ± 12%; p=0.18) and histology (DS 24.6 ± 10% versus FHS 23.58 ± 10%; p=0.8) was similar between both animal groups. At 90 days, the degree of neointimal formation in the DS group decreased in all analysed variables (-40% in IVUS neointimal volume, -57% in OCT %AS, and -30% in %AS by histology) compared to the progression of neointimal formation observed in the FHS group (+29% in IVUS neointimal volume, +27% in OCT %AS and +43% in %AS by histology). CONCLUSION: The pattern of neointimal formation following BMS implantation in the FHS follows a progressive course that does not occur in the DS. Therefore, by providing a progressive neointimal biological response to BMS implantation, the FHS could serve as an ideal efficacy model for the validation of drug eluting stent technologies.
INTRODUCTION: To date, most of all new developments in stent technologies are tested in normal animals. Although invaluable in the evaluation of device safety, the juvenile domestic swine (DS) do not follow the biological healing response occurring in humans following coronary stent implantation. By using a novel swine breed afflicted with familial hypercholesterolemia (FHS), we aimed to analyse the vascular response occurring following bare metal stent (BMS) implantation by comparing in vivo endovascular imaging and histological data. METHODS: A total of 26 swine were included in this study (12 FHS and 14 DS). Sixty eight BMS (FHS=28 versus DS=40) were implanted using a 10% overstretch ratio. Imaging evaluation (IVUS and OCT) was conducted in all animals at 30 (n=14) or 90 (n=12) days following stent implantation. After imaging, the stented coronary segments were harvested for histological evaluation. RESULTS: At 30 days, the degree of neointimal formation analysed by OCT (%AS=DS 21.9 ± 10% versus FHS 25.4 ± 12%; p=0.18) and histology (DS 24.6 ± 10% versus FHS 23.58 ± 10%; p=0.8) was similar between both animal groups. At 90 days, the degree of neointimal formation in the DS group decreased in all analysed variables (-40% in IVUS neointimal volume, -57% in OCT %AS, and -30% in %AS by histology) compared to the progression of neointimal formation observed in the FHS group (+29% in IVUS neointimal volume, +27% in OCT %AS and +43% in %AS by histology). CONCLUSION: The pattern of neointimal formation following BMS implantation in the FHS follows a progressive course that does not occur in the DS. Therefore, by providing a progressive neointimal biological response to BMS implantation, the FHS could serve as an ideal efficacy model for the validation of drug eluting stent technologies.
Authors: Xiaoqin Hua; Tobias Deuse; Evangelos D Michelakis; Alois Haromy; Phil S Tsao; Lars Maegdefessel; Reinhold G Erben; Claudia Bergow; Boris B Behnisch; Hermann Reichenspurner; Robert C Robbins; Sonja Schrepfer Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Andrew L Wentland; Oliver Wieben; Dhanansayan Shanmuganayagam; Christian G Krueger; Jennifer J Meudt; Daniel Consigny; Leonardo Rivera; Patrick E McBride; Jess D Reed; Thomas M Grist Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Fang Yuan; Liang Guo; Kyoung-Ha Park; John R Woollard; Kwon Taek-Geun; Kai Jiang; Tamene Melkamu; Bin Zang; Samantha L Smith; Scott C Fahrenkrug; Frank D Kolodgie; Amir Lerman; Renu Virmani; Lilach O Lerman; Daniel F Carlson Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Marco Busnelli; Stefano Manzini; Alberto Froio; Alessia Vargiolu; Maria Grazia Cerrito; Ryszard T Smolenski; Massimo Giunti; Alessandro Cinti; Augusta Zannoni; Biagio Eugenio Leone; Monica Forni; Maria Laura Bacci; Giorgio Maria Biasi; Roberto Giovannoni; Marialuisa Lavitrano Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana M Porras; Dhanansayan Shanmuganayagam; Jennifer J Meudt; Christian G Krueger; Timothy A Hacker; Peter S Rahko; Jess D Reed; Kristyn S Masters Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 5.501