Literature DB >> 20950511

Rigid endoscopic evaluation of conventional curettage adenoidectomy.

D Regmi1, N N Mathur, M Bhattarai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of conventional adenoidectomy, using rigid endoscopy of the nasopharynx, and to establish the role of such evaluation in facilitating complete adenoid removal via the curettage technique.
DESIGN: Descriptive rigid endoscopic evaluation of the nasopharynx before and after adenoid curettage, and following subsequent endoscopy-assisted adenoidectomy.
SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: Forty-one consecutive children with symptomatic adenoid hypertrophy scheduled to undergo adenoidectomy.
RESULTS: Rigid endoscopic evaluation indicated that conventional curettage, used alone, failed to completely remove adenoid tissue from the superomedial choanae and anterior vault in all cases; incomplete removal was also seen in other parts of the choanae (in 67.2 per cent of patients), the eustachian tube opening (63 per cent), the nasopharyngeal roof (61.78 per cent) and the fossa of Rosenmuller (61 per cent). Subsequent rigid endoscopy-assisted adenoidectomy successfully removed the residual adenoid tissue from all nasopharyngeal sites, except the eustachian tube opening in two cases.
CONCLUSION: Conventional curettage adenoidectomy misses a substantial amount of adenoid tissue. Rigid endoscopy-assisted adenoidectomy improves this result by enabling localisation of any residual adenoid tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20950511     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215110002100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  7 in total

1.  Endoscopic nasopharyngeal exploration at the end of conventional curettage adenoidectomy.

Authors:  Mosaad Abdel-Aziz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Plasma Dissection Versus Tissue Dissection in Adenoid Surgery.

Authors:  Vaidik Mayurkumar Chauhan; Kalpesh B Patel; Rajesh Vishwakarma
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-07-29

3.  Conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy.

Authors:  Viorel Zainea
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2011-10

4.  Paediatric adenoidectomy: endoscopic coblation technique compared to cold curettage.

Authors:  L Di Rienzo Businco; A M Angelone; A Mattei; L Ventura; M Lauriello
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy versus conventional curettage adenoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liyun Yang; Yamin Shan; Shili Wang; Changping Cai; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-11

6.  Video Nasoendoscopic-Assisted Transoral Adenoidectomy with the PEAK PlasmaBlade: A Preliminary Report of a Case Series.

Authors:  Chao-Yin Kuo; Yuan-Yung Lin; Hsin-Chien Chen; Cheng-Ping Shih; Chih-Hung Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparative Study for Efficacy and Safety of Adenoidectomy according to the Surgical Method: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jeong-Whun Kim; Hong Joong Kim; Woo Hyun Lee; Dong-Kyu Kim; Sung Wan Kim; Young Hyo Kim; Jung Gwon Nam; Seok-Won Park; Chan-Soon Park; Woo Yong Bae; Nam-Kyung Yeo; Tae-Bin Won; Seung Hoon Lee; Tae-Hoon Lee; Hyoung Joo Lee; Sang-Wook Kim; Sung-Wook Jeong; Jeong-Seok Choi; Doo Hee Han; Ji Ho Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.