R Obholzer1, J Ahmed, F Warburton, M J Wareing. 1. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, St Bartholomew's and the Royal London Hospital, London, UK. rupertobholzer@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the hearing changes associated with sacrificing an intact ossicular chain during cholesteatoma surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the operation notes of surgical procedures performed by the senior author between October 2000 and April 2006. Thirty-three cases were identified in which cholesteatoma surgery had been performed in the presence of a mobile, intact ossicular chain. One set of case notes was missing; therefore, 32 cases were included in the analysis. The ossicular chain was preserved in 17 cases (14 males and three females) and sacrificed in 15 (eight males and seven females). RESULTS: At the first post-operative assessment, a median air-bone gap deterioration of 3.3 dB was seen in patients in whom the ossicular chain had been sacrificed, while a median air-bone gap improvement of 3.3 dB was seen in those in whom the chain had been preserved. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis suggested that this difference in hearing outcomes was due to pre-operative hearing status, and that preservation of the ossicular chain did not lead to a better outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In cholesteatoma surgery, there is at most a marginal benefit in preserving the ossicular chain. In the current study, the better hearing outcomes associated with preservation of the ossicular chain were accounted for by patients' better pre-operative hearing status. This study did not demonstrate a difference in residual disease rate, but was underpowered to do so.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the hearing changes associated with sacrificing an intact ossicular chain during cholesteatoma surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the operation notes of surgical procedures performed by the senior author between October 2000 and April 2006. Thirty-three cases were identified in which cholesteatoma surgery had been performed in the presence of a mobile, intact ossicular chain. One set of case notes was missing; therefore, 32 cases were included in the analysis. The ossicular chain was preserved in 17 cases (14 males and three females) and sacrificed in 15 (eight males and seven females). RESULTS: At the first post-operative assessment, a median air-bone gap deterioration of 3.3 dB was seen in patients in whom the ossicular chain had been sacrificed, while a median air-bone gap improvement of 3.3 dB was seen in those in whom the chain had been preserved. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis suggested that this difference in hearing outcomes was due to pre-operative hearing status, and that preservation of the ossicular chain did not lead to a better outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In cholesteatoma surgery, there is at most a marginal benefit in preserving the ossicular chain. In the current study, the better hearing outcomes associated with preservation of the ossicular chain were accounted for by patients' better pre-operative hearing status. This study did not demonstrate a difference in residual disease rate, but was underpowered to do so.