Literature DB >> 20949410

[Time course of microbial colonization of different voice prostheses].

T Schuldt1, S Dommerich, H-W Pau, B Kramp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For the vocal rehabilitation of laryngectomized patients, voice prostheses are actually one of the best known methods. Caused by the surface colonisation with bacteria and fungi the life time of the prostheses is limited to 3-4 months.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a time period of 127 months we analysed the surface colonisation of 118 voice prostheses.
RESULTS: The mean life time of the prostheses was 156 days. In reference to the prosthesis model we also recorded different times of usage (ESKA-Herrmann 141, Provox 2 184 and Provox 1 204 days (p>0.05)). In the microbiological examination the dominating bacteria were S. aureus, Klebsiella sp. and Proteus sp. It was possible to cultivate all these bacteria on every type of prosthesis used in the study. In addition C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei and C. tropicalis were the main fungi on the silicone surface. Thereby a more frequent colonisation with C. krusei on ESKA-Herrmann prostheses was measured, caused by the bigger contact area with saliva on this model (p=0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the similar position and way of function, all types of voice prostheses are colonized by almost the same species of bacteria and fungi. But in dependency of the type an affinity of individual species to special prostheses exist. The knowledge of these individual affinities is necessary for the further development of voice prostheses. Furthermore the diversity of bacteria and fungi species showed a level of saturation on the surface. This is caused by the limited space on the silicone prostheses. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20949410     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1261969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  4 in total

1.  Biofilm on the tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: considerations for oral decontamination.

Authors:  Eszter Somogyi-Ganss; Mark S Chambers; Jan S Lewin; Jeffrey J Tarrand; Katherine A Hutcheson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Intraoral voice recording-towards a new smartphone-based method for vocal rehabilitation.

Authors:  T Schuldt; B Kramp; A Ovari; D Timmermann; S Dommerich; R Mlynski; P Ottl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Intraoral voice recording-towards a new smartphone-based method for vocal rehabilitation. German version].

Authors:  T Schuldt; B Kramp; A Ovari; D Timmermann; S Dommerich; R Mlynski; P Ottl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Molecular Characterization of Fungal Colonization on the Provox™ Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis in Post Laryngectomy Patients.

Authors:  Hasti Kamali Sarvestani; Roshanak Daie Ghazvini; Seyed Jamal Hashemi; Mohsen Gerami Shoar; Saham Ansari; Zahra Rafat; Aslan Ahmadi; Pedram Borghei; Miad Elahi; Abbas Rahimi Foroushani; Muhammad Ibrahim Getso; Shima Aboutalebian; Fatemeh Safari; Pegah Ardi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.429

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.