Literature DB >> 20949293

An analysis of failed microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm: focused on the early reoperative findings.

Jun Zhong1, Jin Zhu, Shi-Ting Li, Xin-Yuan Li, Xu-Hui Wang, Min Yang, Liang Wan, Hong-Xin Guan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the microvascular decompression (MVD) has become a definitive treatment for the primary hemifacial spasm (HFS), there still are some failed cases. To obtain a satisfactory postoperative outcome, those failure cases of MVD need to be analyzed.
METHOD: Between January and October 2009, 393 patients with primary HFS underwent MVD. Postoperatively, 375 presented complete spasm-free, 7 improved apparently, and 11 without any improvement at all. A reoperation was performed in 9 of the 11 patients who had poor outcome within 5 days. Those redo MVD cases were reviewed.
FINDINGS: After the reoperation, the symptom of those patients all disappeared immediately. Therefore, the final outcomes were excellent in 97.7%, good in 1.8%, and poor in 0.5%. Up to the 1 year follow-up period, neither recurrence nor change was found. For the two patients without reoperation, their symptoms remained. The previous surgery was a failure due to insufficient decompression in two and conflict missed in seven.
CONCLUSIONS: A successful MVD operation is attributable to a thorough exploration of the entire nerve course. An early relief should become the ambition of the operator while performing MVD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20949293     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-010-0794-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  6 in total

1.  An ideal microvascular decompression technique should be simple and safe.

Authors:  Jun Zhong
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: focus on late reoperation.

Authors:  Xuhui Wang; Parthasarathy D Thirumala; Aalap Shah; Paul Gardner; Miguel Habeych; Donald Crammond; Jeffrey Balzer; Lois Burkhart; Michael Horowitz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Management of symptomatic hemifacial spasm or trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Ming-Xing Liu; Jun Zhong; Ning-Ning Dou; Lei Xia; Bin Li; Shi-Ting Li
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  A significant correlation between delayed cure after microvascular decompression and positive response to preoperative anticonvulsant therapy in patients with hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  Shunsuke Terasaka; Katsuyuki Asaoka; Shigeru Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Hiroaki Motegi; Kiyohiro Houkin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Hemifacial Spasm Caused by Vascular Compression in the Cisternal Portion of the Facial Nerve: Report of Two Cases with Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Byung-Chul Son; Hak-Cheol Ko; Jin-Gyu Choi
Journal:  Case Rep Neurol Med       Date:  2019-01-01

Review 6.  Indications and Timings of Re-operation for Residual or Recurrent Hemifacial Spasm after Microvascular Decompression: Personal Experience and Literature Review.

Authors:  Toru Hatayama; Takuji Kono; Yoichi Harada; Keiichi Yamashita; Toshifumi Utsunomiya; Mototaka Hayashi; Hiroyuki Nakajima; Ryo Hatanaka; Daisuke Shimada; Atsuhito Takemura; Hidefumi Tabata; Hana Tobishima
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 1.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.