| Literature DB >> 20948951 |
Efigênia F Ferreira1, Andréa Maria D Vargas, Lia S Castilho, Leila Nunes M Velásquez, Lucia M Fantinel, Mauro Henrique N G Abreu.
Abstract
The present paper examines the relationship between hydrochemical characteristics and endemic dental fluorosis, controlling for variables with information on an individual level. An epidemiological survey was carried out in seven rural communities in two municipalities in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The Thystrup & Fejerskov index was employed by a single examiner for the diagnosis of dental fluorosis. A sampling campaign of deep groundwater in the rural communities of interest was carried out concomitantly to the epidemiological survey for the determination of physiochemical parameters. Multilevel modeling of 276 individuals from seven rural communities was achieved using the non-linear logit link function. Parameters were estimated using the restricted maximum likelihood method. Analysis was carried out considering two response variables: presence (TF 1 to 9) or absence (TF = 0) of any degree of dental fluorosis; and presence (TF ≥ 5-with loss of enamel structure) or absence of severe dental fluorosis (TF ≤ 4-with no loss of enamel structure). Hydrogeological analyses revealed that dental fluorosis is influenced by the concentration of fluoride (OR = 2.59 CI95% 1.07-6.27; p = 0.073) and bicarbonate (OR = 1.02 CI95% 1.01-1.03; p = 0.060) in the water of deep wells. No other variable was associated with this prevalence (p > 0.05). More severe dental fluorosis (TF ≥ 5) was only associated with age group (p < 0.05). No other variable was associated to the severe dental fluorosis (p > 0.05). Dental fluorosis was found to be highly prevalent and severe. A chemical element besides fluoride was found to be associated (p > 0.05) to the prevalence of dental fluorosis, although this last finding should be interpreted with caution due to its p value.Entities:
Keywords: dental fluorosis; epidemiology; geology; multilevel analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20948951 PMCID: PMC2954572 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph7083115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1.(a) Map showing the study area (São Francisco and Verdelândia). (b) Map showing the northern portion of Minas Gerais. (c) Location of Minas Gerais in Brazil.
Figure 2.Hierarchical structure of hydrochemical data and variables with information at the individual level.
Individual demographic characteristics, access to dental treatment and dental fluorosis in different rural communities, São Francisco and Verdelândia, Brazil.
| Mocambo (n = 65) | 43.1% | 44.6% | 30.8% | 33.8% | 21.5% | 13.8% | 20.0% | 27.7% | 52.3% |
| Vaqueta (n = 47) | 14.9% | 42.6% | 46.8% | 34.0% | 8.5% | 10.6% | 6.4% | 27.6% | 66.0% |
| Novo Horizonte (n = 46) | 32.6% | 52.2% | 34.8% | 28.3% | 23.9% | 13.0% | 2.2% | 19.5% | 78.3% |
| Amargoso (n = 57) | 40.4% | 54.4% | 29.8% | 43.9% | 24.6% | 1.8% | 8.8% | 45.6% | 45.6% |
| Barreiro Anjicos (n = 33) | 45.4% | 48.5% | 15.2% | 21.2% | 63.6% | 0.0% | 81.8% | 9.1% | 9.1% |
| Brejo do Anjicos (n = 13) | 15.4% | 53.8% | 84.6% | 15.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 23.1% | 53.8% | 23.1% |
| Furado Grande (n = 15) | 13.3% | 53.3% | 53.3% | 40.0% | 6.7% | 0.0% | 13.3% | 73.4% | 13.3% |
| Total (n = 276) | 33.3% | 51.1% | 35.9% | 33.3% | 23.2% | 7.6% | 19.6% | 31.5% | 48.9% |
Hydrochemical characteristics in different rural districts, São Francisco and Verdelândia, Brazil.
| Mocambo (n = 65) | 3.2 | 80.9 | 375.8 | 95.0 | 20.9 | 9.7 | 7.60 | 961.8 |
| Vaqueta (n = 47) | 3.0 | 176.7 | 375.5 | 185.0 | 381.0 | 5.6 | 7.80 | 1,195.2 |
| Novo Horizonte (n = 46) | 3.9 | 23.1 | 363.0 | 170.0 | 121.5 | 6.1 | 8.50 | 1,202.9 |
| Amargoso (n = 57) | 4.8 | 170.4 | 351.4 | 28.7 | 169.0 | 14.7 | 7.79 | 1,084.0 |
| Barreiro Anjicos (n = 33) | 2.2 | 28.5 | 243.4 | 235.0 | 283.0 | 4.7 | 8.50 | 1,621.3 |
| Brejo do Anjicos (n = 13) | 2.6 | 23.9 | 452.5 | 195.0 | 98.0 | 10.8 | 8.00 | 942.1 |
| Furado Grande (n = 15) | 1.4 | 22.9 | 473.0 | 62.7 | 4.4 | 53.3 | 8.00 | 503.9 |
Multilevel models for variables associated to the presence or absence of dental fluorosis in rural communities of São Francisco and Verdelândia, Brazil.
| OR (95%CI) | Standard Error | p-value | ||
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.6148 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.72 (0.68–4.40) | 0.4764 | 0.255 | |
| 13 to 15 | 0.92 (0.34–2.47) | 0.5042 | 0.864 | |
| 16 or more | 1.55 (0.30–8.05) | 0.8367 | 0.599 | |
| Gender | Female | 1.00 | 0.6254 | |
| Male | 1.13 (0.55–2.34) | 0.3694 | 0.742 | |
| Access to dental care | No | 1.00 | 0.6202 | |
| Yes | 0.65 (0.30–1.40) | 0.3882 | 0.269 | |
| Fluorine | 2.07 (0.58–7.40) | 0.5744 | 0.262 | |
| Fluorine | 1.91 (0.34–10.84) | 0.7862 | 0.457 | |
| Calcium | 1.00 (0.98–1.03) | 0.0124 | 0.875 | |
| Fluorine | 2.59 (1.07–6.27) | 0.4002 | 0.073 | |
| Bicarbonate | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | 0.0059 | 0.060 | |
| Fluorine | 1.79 (0.74–4.35) | 0.6478 | 0.221 | |
| Sodium | 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | 0.0093 | 0.443 | |
| Fluorine | 2.15 (0.53–8.67) | 0.6309 | 0.292 | |
| Chlorine | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.0050 | 0.634 | |
| Fluorine | 2.98 (0.71–12.48) | 0.6491 | 0.167 | |
| Magnesium | 1.05 (0.95–1.16) | 0.0433 | 0.330 | |
| Fluorine | 1.95 (0.48–7.97) | 0.6372 | 0.354 | |
| pH | 0.43 (0.01–36.84) | 2.0171 | 0.695 | |
| Fluorine | 2.54 (0.88–7.37) | 0.4822 | 0.123 | |
| Conductivity | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.0015 | 0.135 | |
Multilevel models for variables associated to the presence or absence of TF ≥ 5 dental fluorosis in rural communities of São Francisco and Verdelândia, Brazil.
| OR (95%CI) | Standard Error | p-value | ||
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.5118 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.95 (1.03–3.69) | 0.3242 | 0.040 | |
| 13 to 15 | 3.10 (1.41–6.85) | 0.4027 | 0.006 | |
| 16 or more | 2.76 (0.93–8.18) | 0.5525 | 0.067 | |
| Gender | Female | 1.00 | 0.4870 | |
| Male | 0.90 (0.54–1.51) | 0.2644 | 0.689 | |
| Access to dental care | No | 1.00 | 0.4866 | |
| Yes | 0.88 (0.50–1.54) | 0.2868 | 0.650 | |
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.4549 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.93 (1.02–3.66) | 0.3251 | 0.044 | |
| 13 to 15 | 3.02 (1.37–6.64) | 0.4012 | 0.007 | |
| 16 or more | 2.72 (0.92–8.07) | 0.5522 | 0.070 | |
| Fluorine | 2.14 (0.80–5.69) | 0.4437 | 0.147 | |
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.5238 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.94 (1.03–3.68) | 0.3252 | 0.042 | |
| 13 to 15 | 3.13 (1.41–6.93) | 0.4042 | 0.006 | |
| 16 or more | 2.74 (0.92–8.12) | 0.5527 | 0.069 | |
| Calcium | 1.01 (0.99–1.03) | 0.0079 | 0.378 | |
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.5446 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.97 (1.04–3.73) | 0.3249 | 0.038 | |
| 13 to 15 | 3.23 (1.44–7.25) | 0.4108 | 0.005 | |
| 16 or more | 2.78 (0.94–8.24) | 0.5534 | 0.066 | |
| Bicarbonate | 1.00 (0.99–1.02) | 0.0082 | 0.638 | |
| OR (95%CI) | Standard Error | p-value | ||
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.5610 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.95 (1.03–3.70) | 0.3253 | 0.040 | |
| 13 to 15 | 3.16 (1.42–7.02) | 0.4058 | 0.005 | |
| 16 or more | 2.74 (0.93–8.14) | 0.5530 | 0.069 | |
| Sodium | 1.00 (0.98–1.02) | 0.0079 | 0.812 | |
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.5637 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.96 (1.03–3.72) | 0.3255 | 0.039 | |
| 13 to 15 | 3.14 (1.42–6.98) | 0.4057 | 0.006 | |
| 16 or more | 2.75 (0.93–8.15) | 0.5534 | 0.069 | |
| Chlorine | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.0044 | 0.882 | |
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.5191 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.97 (1.04–3.74) | 0.3263 | 0.039 | |
| 13 to 15 | 3.05 (1.38–6.75) | 0.4031 | 0.006 | |
| 16 or more | 2.73 (0.92–8.10) | 0.5532 | 0.070 | |
| Magnesium | 0.97 (0.90–1.05) | 0.0348 | 0.416 | |
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.5527 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.96 (1.03–3.71) | 0.3250 | 0.004 | |
| 13 to 15 | 3.19 (1.43–7.09) | 0.4067 | 0.005 | |
| 16 or more | 2.74 (0.93–8.13) | 0.5525 | 0.068 | |
| pH | 0.41 (0.01–16.63) | 1.6816 | 0.614 | |
| Age (years) | 6 to 9 | 1.00 | 0.5584 | |
| 10 to 12 | 1.96 (1.03–3.71) | 0.3251 | 0.039 | |
| 13 to 15 | 3.17 (1.42–7.07) | 0.4082 | 0.006 | |
| 16 or more | 2.75 (0.93–8.17) | 0.5532 | 0.068 | |
| Conductivity | 1.00 (1.00–1.01) | 0.0018 | 0.885 | |