Literature DB >> 20948806

Advances in understanding the interaction between the gut microbiota and adaptive mucosal immune responses.

Andrew S Neish, Timothy L Denning.   

Abstract

Commensal gut bacteria are necessary for the complete development of mucosal innate and adaptive immunity and thus may influence intestinal and systemic immune disorders. Recent work has advanced our understanding of this association by identification of a single taxon of the murine microbiota which can stimulate T-cell development and differentiation. It is hoped that further characterization of the mechanisms involved will enable targeted manipulation of the microbiota-immune system relationship.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20948806      PMCID: PMC2948354          DOI: 10.3410/B2-27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep        ISSN: 1757-594X


Introduction and context

Eukaryotes have been living in intimate contact with prokaryotes throughout the course of evolution. Especially in the context of the gut, the host has developed highly conserved interrelated systems to protect itself from pathogenic attack whilst allowing beneficial microbes - symbionts - to thrive. Past study of primordial immune mechanisms conserved in non-vertebrates has richly informed our understanding of the activation (and suppression) of innate immune networks. As adaptive immunity is restricted to vertebrates, our appreciation of how gut commensal communities interact with mucosal and systemic adaptive immunity is less understood. The gut/mucosal arm of the adaptive immune system provides humoral and cell-mediated immunity against ingested antigens and luminal organisms and is localized predominantly in the small bowel. Effector lymphocytes are diffusely distributed in the lamina propria (LP) or in isolated lymphoid follicles or are organized into discrete structures termed Peyer’s patches, which are essentially mucosal lymph nodes overlaid with a specialized epithelial cell type, the M cell, which possesses the endocytic machinery for uptake of particulate antigens from the gut lumen. Members of the normal flora, along with non-viable particulate antigens and all-too-viable pathogens, are continually being sampled by the M cells and perhaps other portals for processing by local dendritic cells or macrophages and subsequent education and activation of effector B and T cells [1]. The microbiota is clearly involved in the anatomic and functional development of mucosal immunity [2]. Peyer’s patches are grossly hypoplastic and IgA responses are reduced in germ-free animals. It is also known that germ-free animals have reduced total CD4 T-cell populations and an inappropriate balance of TH-cell subsets [3], which can be moderated within weeks upon colonization with a representative member of the normal flora (Bacteroides fragilis) [4] via dendritic cell recognition of a specific polysaccharide (polysaccharide A) component of B. fragilis [5]. Interestingly, the intestinal LP in healthy animals was shown to be a major location of a unique population of interleukin-17-producing CD4+ T cells (TH17 cells) distinct from TH1- or TH2-cell lineages [6,7]. This work has spawned an explosion of interest in the development and functions of TH17 cells in health and disease, especially in the gastrointestinal tract. While TH17 cells are increased in inflamed intestinal tissue, it remains unclear whether these cells are pathogenic or protective during intestinal inflammation; additionally, the mechanisms driving their development and differentiation are now only beginning to emerge [8].

Major recent advances

Analyses in germ-free mice as well as antibiotic-treated conventional mice have shown that the intestinal microbiota can drive the development of TH17 cells in the murine intestine [9,10]. The mechanism by which the intestinal microbiota induces TH17 cells is not via the classical Toll-like receptor adaptor molecules MyD88 or Trif, but potentially via ATP generation. To begin to probe which components of the diverse microbiota may preferentially induce TH17 cells, Ivanov et al. [11] performed an immunophenotypic comparison of the same mouse strain (B6) obtained from two commercial vendors (Taconic, Tarrytown, NY, USA, and The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and found that the mice from The Jackson Laboratory showed a remarkable lack of TH17 cells in the LP. Interestingly, transfer of Taconic flora (by direct gavage of fecal flora or by cohousing) to the mice from The Jackson Laboratory resulted in the induction of LP TH17 cells, indicating a stark difference in the immunostimulatory potential of the distinct microbiota. This observation has been further developed in two recent papers by Ivanov et al. [11] and Gaboriau-Routhiau et al. [12], both reaching the surprising conclusion that T-cell development in general and TH17 differentiation in particular are largely induced by the action of a single (or at least limited) number of bacterial taxa. In the paper of Ivanov and colleagues [11], the authors exploited the Phylochip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) - a 16s ribosomal microarray platform that serves as a massive (300,000 probe) parallel survey of microbial taxa - and identified segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB), a non-culturable spore-forming Gram-positive Clostridia-related species present in B6 mice from Taconic, but not The Jackson Laboratory. With the use of germ-free mice or Jackson Laboratory-sourced mice colonized (‘conventionalized’) with SFB, this group studied TH17 differentiation in LP lymphocyte populations and expression profiling to show that SFB could recapitulate the inductive effects of the intact Taconic microbiota [11]. An independent group headed by Gaboriau-Routhiau also used an expression profiling approach to characterize host responses of germ-free mice conventionalized with normal murine microbiota and found distinct patterns of innate (inflammatory) gene expression and adaptive immune stimulation (LP T-cell maturation). This signature of normal immune development was not induced by candidate mono-associated microbiota representatives or complex normal human microflora [12]; however, the host immune response pattern to normal murine microflora could be recapitulated by SFB as a mono-associated strain, further implicating this taxon as a primary driver of adaptive immune development (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Intestinal microflora modulates mucosal immune responses

Recent reports implicate segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) as the major component of the commensal microbiota which modulates mucosal T-cell development/responses. SFB, in particular, are potent inducers of TH17 differentiation. The mechanisms by which these bacteria direct T-cell differentiation are poorly understood at present but may include direct interactions with intestinal epithelial cells, dendritic cells (DC), or macrophages (Mφ) (or all three). Treg, regulatory T cells.

Intestinal microflora modulates mucosal immune responses

Recent reports implicate segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) as the major component of the commensal microbiota which modulates mucosal T-cell development/responses. SFB, in particular, are potent inducers of TH17 differentiation. The mechanisms by which these bacteria direct T-cell differentiation are poorly understood at present but may include direct interactions with intestinal epithelial cells, dendritic cells (DC), or macrophages (Mφ) (or all three). Treg, regulatory T cells.

Future directions

Though intriguing, these findings raise many important questions. SFB are not cultivable and must be maintained in monocultured mice [13] and introduced to other mice by cohousing. Thus, further characterization of the SFB is obviously necessary; sequencing of their genome will be eagerly anticipated, as will be culture techniques that may allow them to be more readily introduced into test systems. It will be interesting to see what other taxa can mediate the immune stimulatory phenotype and whether there is a specific ligand (microbial-associated molecular pattern, or MAMP) present on a subset (perhaps a very limited subset) of commensals. Conversely, what are the specific receptors that the host uses to perceive this functional class of microbe and which cell types in specific regions of the intestine sense SFB in order to direct adaptive immunity? In directing TH-cell differentiation, do SFB and other commensal bacteria directly interact with LP dendritic cells and macrophages that augment TH17 and Treg (regulatory T) responses [14-17] or do they induce changes in intestinal epithelial cells that in turn imprint dendritic cells with this capacity [18]? Are SFB invasive to epithelial cells? It is also clearly important to identify the human SFB equivalent(s). As potential targets for modification, SFB may offer a clue to the identification of bacteria that could be added to (or suppressed from) the microflora to accrue benefits such as altered immune regulation relevant to human disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease and systemic autoimmunity.
  18 in total

Review 1.  Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens.

Authors:  Allan McI Mowat
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system.

Authors:  Andrew J Macpherson; Nicola L Harris
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells.

Authors:  Ivaylo I Ivanov; Brent S McKenzie; Liang Zhou; Carlos E Tadokoro; Alice Lepelley; Juan J Lafaille; Daniel J Cua; Dan R Littman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Lamina propria macrophages and dendritic cells differentially induce regulatory and interleukin 17-producing T cell responses.

Authors:  Timothy L Denning; Yi-chong Wang; Seema R Patel; Ifor R Williams; Bali Pulendran
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria.

Authors:  Ivaylo I Ivanov; Koji Atarashi; Nicolas Manel; Eoin L Brodie; Tatsuichiro Shima; Ulas Karaoz; Dongguang Wei; Katherine C Goldfarb; Clark A Santee; Susan V Lynch; Takeshi Tanoue; Akemi Imaoka; Kikuji Itoh; Kiyoshi Takeda; Yoshinori Umesaki; Kenya Honda; Dan R Littman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Intestinal epithelial cells promote colitis-protective regulatory T-cell differentiation through dendritic cell conditioning.

Authors:  I D Iliev; E Mileti; G Matteoli; M Chieppa; M Rescigno
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 7.313

7.  A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Sarkis K Mazmanian; June L Round; Dennis L Kasper
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  ATP drives lamina propria T(H)17 cell differentiation.

Authors:  Koji Atarashi; Junichi Nishimura; Tatsuichiro Shima; Yoshinori Umesaki; Masahiro Yamamoto; Masaharu Onoue; Hideo Yagita; Naoto Ishii; Richard Evans; Kenya Honda; Kiyoshi Takeda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Mono-association of mice with non-cultivable, intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria.

Authors:  H L Klaasen; J P Koopman; M E Van den Brink; H P Van Wezel; A C Beynen
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Small intestine lamina propria dendritic cells promote de novo generation of Foxp3 T reg cells via retinoic acid.

Authors:  Cheng-Ming Sun; Jason A Hall; Rebecca B Blank; Nicolas Bouladoux; Mohamed Oukka; J Rodrigo Mora; Yasmine Belkaid
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mucosal immunity and the microbiome.

Authors:  Andrew S Neish
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2014-01

2.  Immune response of chicken gut to natural colonization by gut microflora and to Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis infection.

Authors:  Magdalena Crhanova; Helena Hradecka; Marcela Faldynova; Marta Matulova; Hana Havlickova; Frantisek Sisak; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Changes in human gut flora with age: an Indian familial study.

Authors:  Nachiket Marathe; Sudarshan Shetty; Vikram Lanjekar; Dilip Ranade; Yogesh Shouche
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 4.  Iron Transport Tocopheryl Polyethylene Glycol Succinate in Animal Health and Diseases.

Authors:  Ajay Srivastava; Rajiv Lall; Jamil Talukder; Dan DuBourdieu; Ramesh C Gupta
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Age-related alterations in blood and colonic dendritic cell properties.

Authors:  Rakesh Vora; David Bernardo; Lydia Durant; Durga Reddi; Ailsa L Hart; John M E Fell; Hafid O Al-Hassi; Stella C Knight
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.