BACKGROUND: Previous research shows associations of geographical density of alcohol outlets with a range of alcohol-related harms. Socioeconomic conditions that are associated with both outlet density and alcohol-related outcomes may confound many studies. We examined the association of outlet density with both consumption and harm throughout New Zealand while controlling for indicators of area deprivation and individual socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: Individual alcohol consumption and drinking consequences were measured in a 2007 national survey of 18-70 year olds (n=1925). All alcohol outlets in New Zealand were geocoded. Outlet density was the number of outlets of each type (off-licences (stores that sell alcoholic beverages for consumption elsewhere), bars, clubs, restaurants) within 1 km of a person's home. We modelled the association of outlet density with total consumption, binge drinking, risky drinking (above New Zealand guidelines) and two measures of effects ('harms' and 'troubles' due to drinking) in the previous year. Logistic regression and zero-inflated Poisson models were used, adjusting for sex, educational level, a deprivation index (NZDep06) and a rurality index. RESULTS: No statistically significant association was seen between outlet density and either average alcohol consumption or risky drinking. Density of off-licences was positively associated with binge drinking, and density of all types of outlet was associated with alcohol-related harm scores, before and after adjustment for SES. Associations of off-licences and clubs with trouble scores were no longer statistically significant in the adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The positive associations seen between alcohol outlet density and both individual level binge drinking and alcohol-related problems appear to be independent of individual and neighbourhood SES. Reducing density of alcohol outlets may reduce alcohol-related harm among those who live nearby.
BACKGROUND: Previous research shows associations of geographical density of alcohol outlets with a range of alcohol-related harms. Socioeconomic conditions that are associated with both outlet density and alcohol-related outcomes may confound many studies. We examined the association of outlet density with both consumption and harm throughout New Zealand while controlling for indicators of area deprivation and individual socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: Individual alcohol consumption and drinking consequences were measured in a 2007 national survey of 18-70 year olds (n=1925). All alcohol outlets in New Zealand were geocoded. Outlet density was the number of outlets of each type (off-licences (stores that sell alcoholic beverages for consumption elsewhere), bars, clubs, restaurants) within 1 km of a person's home. We modelled the association of outlet density with total consumption, binge drinking, risky drinking (above New Zealand guidelines) and two measures of effects ('harms' and 'troubles' due to drinking) in the previous year. Logistic regression and zero-inflated Poisson models were used, adjusting for sex, educational level, a deprivation index (NZDep06) and a rurality index. RESULTS: No statistically significant association was seen between outlet density and either average alcohol consumption or risky drinking. Density of off-licences was positively associated with binge drinking, and density of all types of outlet was associated with alcohol-related harm scores, before and after adjustment for SES. Associations of off-licences and clubs with trouble scores were no longer statistically significant in the adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The positive associations seen between alcohol outlet density and both individual level binge drinking and alcohol-related problems appear to be independent of individual and neighbourhood SES. Reducing density of alcohol outlets may reduce alcohol-related harm among those who live nearby.
Authors: Kypros Kypri; Gabrielle Davie; Patrick McElduff; Jennie Connor; John Langley Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mario Schootman; Anjali D Deshpande; Michael T Lynskey; Sandi L Pruitt; Min Lian; Donna B Jeffe Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2012-04-18
Authors: Hannah L Cooper; Loida E Bonney; Zev Ross; Conny Karnes; Josalin Hunter-Jones; Mary E Kelley; Richard Rothenberg Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jaana I Halonen; Mika Kivimäki; Marianna Virtanen; Jaana Pentti; S V Subramanian; Ichiro Kawachi; Jussi Vahtera Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Allison B Brenner; Ana V Diez Roux; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez; Luisa N Borrell Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 2.164