Literature DB >> 20947463

Inequalities in adoption of cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective: identification of late adopters.

Myung-Il Hahm1, Eun-Cheol Park, Kui Son Choi, Hoo-Yeon Lee, Jae-Hyun Park, Sohee Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although national-level organized cancer screening programs have reduced barriers to screening for people of low socioeconomic status, barriers to early screening remain. Our aim was to determine the diffusion pattern and identify the factors associated with early participation in stomach and breast cancer screening programs.
METHODS: The study population was derived from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, conducted in 2007. A stratified random sample of people aged 40 years and older from a nationwide population-based database was gathered in Korea (n=1,517) in 2007. Time of participation in early screening was defined as the number of years that had elapsed between the participant's 30th birthday and the age at first screening.
RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the probability of adopting stomach and breast cancer screening in relation to education, household income, and job level. Results from Cox's proportional hazard model indicated that higher household income was significantly associated with an increased probability of adopting stomach cancer screening earlier (p<0.05), and people with high household incomes were more likely to adopt breast cancer screening earlier than were those with incomes under US$1,500 per month (p<0.01). When considered at a significance level of 0.1, we found that the most highly educated women were more likely than the least educated to be screened early.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite organized governmental screening programs, there are still inequalities in the early adoption of cancer screening. The results of this study also suggest that inequalities in early adoption may affect participation in regular screening.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20947463     DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  11 in total

1.  Early Adoption of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Robert M Jacobson; Patrick M Wilson; Debra J Jacobson; Chun Fan; John B Kisiel; Seth Sweetser; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; Jennifer L St Sauver
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Strategies to improve repeat fecal occult blood testing cancer screening.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Charles L Bennett; Michael S Wolf; Cristalyn Reynolds; Dachao Liu; Alfred Rademaker
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Fundamental causes of colorectal cancer mortality: the implications of informational diffusion.

Authors:  Andrew Wang; Sean A P Clouston; Marcie S Rubin; Cynthia G Colen; Bruce G Link
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Feasibility of Utilizing Ethnic Beauty Salons for Cervical Cancer Screening Education.

Authors:  Jongwon Lee; Mauricio Carvallo; Eunice Lee
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Cancer screening in Koreans: a focus group approach.

Authors:  Shin-Young Lee; Eunice E Lee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia.

Authors:  Barbara Willems; Piet Bracke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  To switch or not to switch: Intentions to switch to injectable PrEP among gay and bisexual men with at least twelve months oral PrEP experience.

Authors:  Kathrine Meyers; Yumeng Wu; Atrina Brill; Theodorus Sandfort; Sarit A Golub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Time to follow up after an abnormal finding in organized gastric cancer screening in Korea.

Authors:  Hoo-Yeon Lee; Kui Son Choi; Jae Kwan Jun; Myung-Il Hahm; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Gender Differences in Elders' Participation in the National Cancer Screening Program: Evidence from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010-12.

Authors:  Yang-Hyun Kim; Kyunghee Kim; Kyung-do Han; Ji-Su Kim
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Social inequalities and cancer: can the European deprivation index predict patients' difficulties in health care access? a pilot study.

Authors:  Guillaume Moriceau; Aurélie Bourmaud; Fabien Tinquaut; Mathieu Oriol; Jean-Philippe Jacquin; Pierre Fournel; Nicolas Magné; Franck Chauvin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.