Literature DB >> 20947148

Magnetic anchoring and guidance system instrumentation for laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery/natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: lack of histologic damage after prolonged magnetic coupling across the abdominal wall.

Sara L Best1, Wareef Kabbani, Daniel J Scott, Richard Bergs, Heather Beardsley, Raul Fernandez, Lauren B Mashaud, Jeffrey A Cadeddu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the potential pathologic effect of prolonged compression of abdominal wall between the components. Magnetic Anchoring and Guidance System (MAGS) instruments ameliorate some of the challenges in triangulation created by laparo-endoscopic single-site and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. They consist of an intracorporeal magnetic device coupled to an external hand-held magnet used to anchor and "steer" it around the peritoneal cavity.
METHODS: Three pigs (45.5-48.6 kg) underwent laparoscopic placement of magnetic devices in 4 quadrants, with the devices left in place for 2 or 4 hours. Full-thickness abdominal wall sections (mean 2.1 cm thick) where each MAGS platform was placed plus a control were harvested at 0, 2, or 14 days after surgery. Histologic assessment was then performed.
RESULTS: Beyond mild blanching of the peritoneal surface with a few petechiae immediately after internal component removal, no gross tissue damage was seen. These changes were undetectable by 48 hours and no intra-abdominal adhesions were identified at necropsy. NADH stain for tissue viability in the 4 nonsurvival specimens showed no tissue damage. Hematoxylin and eosin stain showed no necrosis of either superficial or deep muscle, skin, or subcutaneous fat tissue in all 12 specimens when compared with the control.
CONCLUSIONS: MAGS instruments do not appear to cause tissue damage or adverse clinical outcomes when coupled across thin porcine abdominal walls for up to 4 hours. Because the distance across the abdominal wall is generally greater in adult human beings, these findings support the further clinical development of magnetic instruments to be used in human patients. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20947148     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: new minimally invasive surgery come of age.

Authors:  Chen Huang; Ren-Xiang Huang; Zheng-Jun Qiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Magnetically anchored cautery dissector improves triangulation, depth perception, and workload during single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nabeel A Arain; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Deborah C Hogg; Richard Bergs; Raul Fernandez; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Tissue compression analysis for magnetically anchored cautery dissector during single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Lauren B Mashaud; Wareef Kabbani; Angel Caban; Sarah Best; Deborah C Hogg; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Richard Bergs; Heather Beardsley; Raul Fernandez; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  A miniaturized robotic platform for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: in vivo validation.

Authors:  Selene Tognarelli; Marco Salerno; Giuseppe Tortora; Claudio Quaglia; Paolo Dario; Marc Oliver Schurr; Arianna Menciassi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A novel percutaneous magnetically guided gastrostomy technique without endoscopy or imaging guidance: a feasibility study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Eduardo Aimore Bonin; Paulo Roberto Walter Ferreira; Marcelo de Paula Loureiro; Thais Andrade Costa-Casagrande; Paolo de Oliveira Salvalaggio; Guilherme Francisco Gomes; Rafael William Noda; Christopher John Gostout; Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Magnetic anchoring guidance system in video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Agnese Giaccone; Piergiorgio Solli; Luca Bertolaccini
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

7.  An application research on a novel internal grasper platform and magnetic anchoring guide system (MAGS) in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Yafei Shang; Hongjun Guo; Da Zhang; Fei Xue; Xiaopeng Yan; Aihua Shi; Dinghui Dong; Shanpei Wang; Feng Ma; Haohua Wang; Jianhui Li; Xuemin Liu; Ruixue Luo; Rongqian Wu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Magnetic anchor guidance for endoscopic submucosal dissection and other endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Mohamed Mortagy; Neal Mehta; Mansour A Parsi; Seiichiro Abe; Tyler Stevens; John J Vargo; Yutaka Saito; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Study of Individual Characteristic Abdominal Wall Thickness Based on Magnetic Anchored Surgical Instruments.

Authors:  Ding-Hui Dong; Wen-Yan Liu; Hai-Bo Feng; Yi-Li Fu; Shi Huang; Jun-Xi Xiang; Yi Lyu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.