Literature DB >> 20947064

Inflammatory responses in two commonly used rat models for experimental tooth movement: comparison with ligature-induced periodontitis.

Rui Xie1, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman, Jaap C Maltha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two often used rat models for experimental tooth movement, namely the elastic band, and the coil spring model. They were compared with a silk-ligature-induced periodontitis model.
DESIGN: Thirty six, 6-weeks-old rats were used. In a split mouth design four experimental conditions were allocated by permutation: (1) insertion of an orthodontic elastic band between the maxillary first and the second molar, (2) placement of a silk ligature around the cervix of the upper second molar, (3) a 10cN NiTi coil spring for mesial movement of the three maxillary molars as one block, and (4) Control. After 1, 3, and 5 days, rats were killed and immunohistochemical staining for ED1, cathepsin K, and MMP9 was performed.
RESULTS: A time-dependent increase in the inflammatory infiltration of the interdental papilla was found in the elastic band and the ligature model, but not in the spring model. The disruption of the epithelium of the interdental papilla and the transseptal fibers was less severe in the spring group than in the other two experimental groups. All three experimental groups showed a time-dependent resorption of the interdental bony septum. However, this started faster and was more severe in the elastic band and the ligature than in the spring group. The numbers of cathepsin K+ and MMP9+ cells were higher in the elastic band and the ligature group than in the spring group.
CONCLUSIONS: Elastic bands yield similar periodontal effects as ligatures. The spring model is to be preferred for experimental tooth movement studies.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20947064     DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  7 in total

Review 1.  Animal models to study host-bacteria interactions involved in periodontitis.

Authors:  Dana T Graves; Jun Kang; Oelisoa Andriankaja; Keisuke Wada; Carlos Rossa
Journal:  Front Oral Biol       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  Orthodontic forces add to nicotine-induced loss of periodontal bone : An in vivo and in vitro study.

Authors:  Christian Kirschneck; Peter Proff; Michael Maurer; Claudia Reicheneder; Piero Römer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  The optimization of ligature/bone defect-induced periodontitis model in rats.

Authors:  Jingyi Gao; Simin Cai; Zijie Wang; Dan Li; Minyi Ou; Xinlu Zhang; Zhihui Tian
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Comparative Testing of Two Ligature-Induced Periodontitis Models in Rats: A Clinical, Histological and Biochemical Study.

Authors:  Darius C Tomina; Ștefan A Petruțiu; Cristian M Dinu; Bogdan Crișan; Vasile S Cighi; Ioana A Rațiu
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21

5.  Apical periodontitis and periodontal disease increase serum IL-17 levels in normoglycemic and diabetic rats.

Authors:  Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra; Renata Oliveira Samuel; Mariane Maffei Azuma; Clícia Pereira Ribeiro; Luis Gustavo Narciso; Valéria Marçal Felix de Lima; Dóris Hissako Sumida; Gilberto Aparecido Coclete; Eloi Dezan-Júnior; João Eduardo Gomes-Filho
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  A modified method for inducing periodontitis in dogs using a silk-wire twisted ligature.

Authors:  Se Eun Kim; Eui Ri Lee; Yesran Lee; Manbok Jeong; Young Woo Park; Jae Sang Ahn; Jeong Taek Ahn; Kangmoon Seo
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.672

7.  A novel Nanoformulation Development of Eugenol and their treatment in inflammation and periodontitis.

Authors:  Niyaz Ahmad; Farhan Jalees Ahmad; Sumit Bedi; Sonali Sharma; Sadiq Umar; Mohammad Azam Ansari
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.330

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.