Literature DB >> 20946141

The effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: a prospective multicenter randomized-controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857).

Patriek Mistiaen1, Wilco Achterberg, Andre Ament, Ruud Halfens, Janneke Huizinga, Ken Montgomery, Henri Post, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Anneke L Francke.   

Abstract

A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial was undertaken to investigate the effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin (AMS) in the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients. Patients were randomized at admission and were then followed daily for 30 days. The experimental group received usual care plus an AMS as a layer on the mattress within ultimately 48 hours after admission; the control group received usual care only. Usual care was all the care that nursing wards normally applied for pressure ulcer prevention without any further standardization for this study. A total of 588 patients were randomized (293 control and 295 experimental group) and the data of 543 patients could be analyzed (272 from the control and 271 from the experimental group). The incidence of sacral pressure ulcers grade 1 or higher was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (8.9% vs. 14.7%). In a multilevel analysis on the incidence of pressure ulcers adjusted for Braden risk score, age, and gender, it shows an odds ratio of 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.95), meaning a significant protective effect of the AMS. These results are in line with the results of two earlier trials on the AMS in hospital patients. The majority of patients in our trial that used an AMS rated it positively, but one-third found the sheepskin too warm. We conclude that the AMS is an effective aid in the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers in nursing home patients.
© 2010 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20946141     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00629.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  7 in total

1.  Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-10

2.  Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of multi-layer silicone foam dressings for the prevention of pressure injuries in high-risk aged care residents: The Border III Trial.

Authors:  Nick Santamaria; Marie Gerdtz; Suzanne Kapp; Lauren Wilson; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  An economic appraisal of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers from a nursing home perspective.

Authors:  Patriek Mistiaen; Andre Ament; Anneke L Francke; Wilco Achterberg; Ruud Halfens; Janneke Huizinga; Henri Post
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Victoria Ramsden; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-10

6.  Reactive air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Vannessa Leung; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-07

7.  Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.