R F Newbold1, K Mokbel. 1. The Brunel Institute of Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: SET domain containing protein 2 (SETD2) is a histone methyltransferase that is involved in transcriptional elongation. We previously demonstrated SETD2 to be a potential tumour suppressor gene in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare SETD2 expression in breast cancer with that in adjacent non-cancerous breast tissue (ANCT) in paired samples. A hypothesis is proposed that explains the mode of action of SETD2 as a tumour suppressor gene. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired samples of tumour and adjacent non-cancerous tissue (ANCT) from 25 patients were analysed. The levels of transcription of SETD2 were determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and normalized against cytokeratin 19. Immunohistochemical staining with appropriate antibodies against SETD2 protein was also performed in selected samples. RESULTS: Levels of SETD2 mRNA were significantly higher in ANCT when compared to those in tumour samples (p=0.01). Immunohistochemistry also demonstrated a higher protein expression in ANCT. CONCLUSION: This study offers further evidence that SETD2 behaves like a tumour suppressor gene. Our hypothesis links SETD2 mode of action with telomerase regulation through human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). Several studies have emphasised the importance of histone methylation of hTERT promotor in telomerase regulation. SETD2 function of histone methylation could be the missing link in this chain which could explain the potential tumour suppressor function of SETD2.
BACKGROUND: SET domain containing protein 2 (SETD2) is a histone methyltransferase that is involved in transcriptional elongation. We previously demonstrated SETD2 to be a potential tumour suppressor gene in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare SETD2 expression in breast cancer with that in adjacent non-cancerous breast tissue (ANCT) in paired samples. A hypothesis is proposed that explains the mode of action of SETD2 as a tumour suppressor gene. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired samples of tumour and adjacent non-cancerous tissue (ANCT) from 25 patients were analysed. The levels of transcription of SETD2 were determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and normalized against cytokeratin 19. Immunohistochemical staining with appropriate antibodies against SETD2 protein was also performed in selected samples. RESULTS: Levels of SETD2 mRNA were significantly higher in ANCT when compared to those in tumour samples (p=0.01). Immunohistochemistry also demonstrated a higher protein expression in ANCT. CONCLUSION: This study offers further evidence that SETD2 behaves like a tumour suppressor gene. Our hypothesis links SETD2 mode of action with telomerase regulation through humantelomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). Several studies have emphasised the importance of histone methylation of hTERT promotor in telomerase regulation. SETD2 function of histone methylation could be the missing link in this chain which could explain the potential tumour suppressor function of SETD2.